SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (387553)4/7/2003 10:07:43 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
We paid a price for our peace and prosperity of the 90's. The price? Our peace and prosperity. President Clinton refused to respond to multiple attacks to our nation out of fears of his own approval ratings. None of the events below are made up.

highvolumemedia.com

In August, 2002, NewsMax.com releases secret audio of then President Clinton admitting for the first time anywhere that he had the chance to take Osama bin Laden into custody, but he nixed the idea because he couldn't come up with a legal justification for the 9-11 mastermind's extradition The tape was recorded at a February 2002 business luncheon on New York's Long Island:
"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in 1991, then he went to Sudan.

"And we'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start meeting with them again - they released him.

"At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

"So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have. But they thought it was a hot potato and they didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan." (End of excerpt)

While many Americans felt great pride in Bill Clinton's approach to terrorism, the Islamic world celebrated on September 11th, 2001



To: American Spirit who wrote (387553)4/7/2003 10:09:38 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The Administration of William Jefferson Clinton

A record of of incompetence in government.

CONCERN FOR CHILDREN? Clinton refuses to agree to a treaty outlawing anti-personnel mines. Avoided by soldiers, these mines stay on the ground long after the end of hostilities, crippling farmers and children.

FREEDOM OF CHOICE? Neglecting the government's hard-won breakup of the telephone industry, Clinton's Justice Department agreed to the merger of Bell Atlantic and NYNEX, sparing consumers the possibility of competition and lower prices.

SPEEDY JUSTICE? Clinton has neglected his responsibility to appoint federal judges, leaving the courts with a worsening backlog. He places the blame on a failure of Senators to make recommendations. This is a specious claim. Constitutionally, the responsibility is the president's to forward the names. He's passing the buck for abrogating his job.

HONESTY? Clinton apparently lied to the people about his philandering. Although he could have admitted mistakes, claimed privacy, or even changed the subject, he chose to proclaim innocence about his bent. This leads one to wonder what else he may have lied about.

FREE SPEECH? Clinton supporters at the 1992 Democratic convention prevented participation by Jerry Brown (now of We the People) and Robert Casey, both of whom had been elected governor of major states.

MERIT IN HIRING? The Clinton administration demanded that appointees prove they had supported his campaign early in the nomination process. This unrealistic demand excluded from consideration thousands of competent people, loyal to country and party, who either supported other candidates (such as the late Paul Tsongas or L. Douglas Wilder) or declined to take sides so early.

PROMPT DECISION-MAKING? After taking office in 1993, Clinton left many key agencies in the hands of inept Bush administration holdovers for months for his failure to nominate replacements. (The Washington Monthly attributed the plane crash that took the life of South Dakota Governor George S. Mickelson to the lack of regulation caused by one of these vacancies.)

NATIONAL SECURITY? Clinton exposed gay military personnel to blackmail and arbitrary harassment with the unworkable "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

CONSTITUENT SERVICE? Clinton cut the White House staff so drastically that they could not properly handle the flow of communication by mail from the American people. If people complain to the administration, Clinton never hears. If people ask about how to get things done, they don't get answers.

LOYALTY? Instead of supporting his designees, he abandoned them. In the worst case, brilliant legal scholar Lani Guinier, who opposed racial quotas, was labeled a "quota queen" and then denied any opportunity to set the record straight. In September, 1997, Clinton said of (Republican) William Weld, "I believe when a president nominates someone for a job, that person's entitled to a hearing before the Foreign Relations Committee." Yet he denied Guinier her hearing. This policy of abandonment has damaged morale within government and scared away from federal service prominent Americans who cannot afford to have their reputations ruined.

ACCEPTING RESPONSIBILITY The Social Security Administration chose a trustee to administer the finances of several mentally incompetent people in Martinsburg, West Virginia. Under insufficient supervision, the trustee embezzled several hundred thousand dollars, bankrupting the people so they could no longer pay for nursing home care. The SSA claims it has no responsibility to reimburse the money that was lost because of its negligence.

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE? After a promise to reform health care and seven years to work on it, all Clinton has produced is one peculiar proposal that couldn't get through Congress. The program would have required employers to cover health insurance costs, discouraging hiring of disabled people and placing an unfair burden on moonlighters.

A REEFER IN EVERY POT? Marijuana overdose has never killed anyone, making it one of the safest drugs in use. Recognizing this, several states decriminalized marijuana in the 1970's. Aside from its popularity as a recreational drug, marijuana is a cheap, effective treatment for preventing blindness from glaucoma and relieving the pain of AIDS. Alternative medications for these conditions have adverse side effects and are weak and expensive. After voters in two states endorsed permitting marijuana to be prescribed, Attorney General Janet Reno threatened to punish not only physicians who prescribe the drug, but also those who recommend it. It appears that a doctor who prescribes marijuana will be stripped of the right to prescribe marijuana. Instead of giving patients the help they need, health practitioners will have to say, "I recommend that you don't take the drug that will do you the most good." The Justice Department claimed voters in California and Arizona were sending children a "mixed message", despite the clear message the rest of us heard. They have gone so far as to endorse the policy of the AMA, the doctor's union that fought Clinton's health care policy. Since Clinton has admitted smoking marijuana himself, his hypocritical stance is aptly called the "'Do as I say, not as I do' policy" by comedian Jay Leno. The widespread use of marijuana by people who were and remain healthy reveals federal law enforcement to be misdirected. The public tolerance of marijuana promises that government resources dedicated to banning it will be completely wasted. For that matter, the War on Drugs is a lost cause.

RECOGNIZING A HERO? After a security guard Richard Jewell reported a suspiscious package at the Atlanta Olympics that later turned out to be a bomb, an FBI employee unprofessionally leaked to the press that the Jewell was under investigation. Instead of apologizing and emphasizing the importance of thorough investigation to rule out suspects, they left Jewell in unemployable limbo for nearly three months. The next person who sees a crime in progress may think twice about reporting it.

LAW ENFORCEMENT? Mark Whitacre reported criminal activity to the FBI. He cooperated with investigators by taping discussion of an international price-fixing conspiracy at Archer Daniels Midland Co. The evidence helped secure a record criminal antitrust fine of $100 million from ADM. Did the government protect Whitacre? Did it reward him with part of the fine? No. It indicted him.

CIVIL JUSTICE? Lawyers in the Justice Department have claimed that David Koresh bears sole responsibility for the deaths of Branch Davidians in Wacko (according to a 14 July 2000 report by Jean Jadhon of WDBJ-TV News). How can a government release from blame hundreds of people who did little or nothing to help children escape from a fire? Consider how dangerous it is for a government to endorse the concept that many people who abandon their will to one charismatic figure can escape responsibility for the consequences.

PUTTING THE PUBLIC FIRST? When there were some security problems at the White House, Clinton allowed a block of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the building to be closed, indefinitely detouring the heavy traffic on that street several blocks away. The additional margin of safety this provided can be only a fraction of what would have been gained by moving the president's office to a location outside the city of Washington.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION? The Clinton administration has done nothing to control the cost of directory assistance calls, which used to be free from pay phones. Phone companies not only charge us to use their equipment, they also charge us for the information necessary to use their equipment.

AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION? The Bureau of Census refuses to provide its 1990 block maps for inspection, referring the public to the Library of Congress. The Library of Congress claims to have sent them to the National Archives in College Park. The National Archives lacks sets of maps for a number of areas, including the largest county in Texas. None of these agencies is willing to take responsibility to comply with legitimate public requests for information. Who are they supposed to be working for?

ACCURACY OF INFORMATION? Stewartsville, Chamblissburg, and Montvale are growing suburbs located respectively 9, 12, and 16 miles east of downtown Roanoke. Federal statistics include them in the metropolitan area of Lynchburg, at least 32 miles away. Because of this misassignment, an economic downturn, such as unemployment, in the three suburbs is likely to result in assistance to Lynchburg, too far away to help.

COATTAILS? Clinton lost both houses of Congress to the opposition in 1994. Then he couldn't get either of them back. Meanwhile, he never has and never will win the endorsement of a majority of the nation's voters. This is an indication that he has done too little to address widespread discontent with government.

DIVERSITY? Clinton's appointments for Secretary of Defense have continued the consistent domination of the armed forces by white males.

CONCLUSION: Although the imcumbent's heart is in the right place, he follows another organ. Lately, it has veered to the right. If we wanted a Republican, we would have voted that way.

rev.net



To: American Spirit who wrote (387553)4/7/2003 10:10:57 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Clinton's failure to mobilize America to confront foreign terror after the 1993 attack led directly to 9-11 disaster

newsandopinion.com -- WHEN the terrorist gang controlled by Bin Laden exploded a bomb in the World Trade Center in 1993 killing six and injuring 650 others, President Clinton did not even visit the site of the attack. In his radio address the next day, he expressed his grief and outrage and four days later visited New Jersey where he sent a message to New Yorkers saluting our courage. Other than those statements, he remained aloof and uninvolved.

The attack occurred in the second month of Clinton's presidency. Issues like gays in the military, the recession, and withdrawing our troops from Somalia loomed larger than the 1993 attack. Clinton deliberately remained removed from the attack perhaps in the hope that he would not be blamed so early in his presidency.

Where Bush insisted, from the outset, that the Trade Center attack that took place on his watch was a declaration of war by foreign terrorists against the United States, Clinton treated the attack as a criminal justice situation not unlike the subsequent bombing of the Federal Office Building in Oklahoma City. But while in Oklahoma, he connected emotionally with the victims, he had nothing to do with them in 1993.

His failure to mobilize America to confront foreign terror after the 1993 attack had dire consequences and led directly to the 2001 disaster. Two years after the 1993 attack, Sudan, sick of sheltering Bin Laden, offered to turn him over to the United States for prosecution. But, without the president breathing down their neck, investigators had not yet discovered that Bin Laden was behind the 1993 attack. Claiming that we lacked evidence to proceed, the US refused Sudan's offer and suggested they turn him over to the Saudis instead. In doing so, the US was disingenuous. We knew full well that the Saudi Arabian kingdom could not afford politically to prosecute their home-grown terrorist.

Clinton was removed, uninvolved, and distant where the war on terror was concerned. CIA director Woolsey now reveals that he never had a private personal meeting with Clinton during the first two years of his tenure as head of the CIA - exactly the key period in investigating the 1993 attack.

I had a good illustration of Clinton's remoteness from terrorist issues in 1996 when Dick Holbrooke called me, several months after the terrorist attack on US barracks in Ridyah, Saudi Arabia. Holbrooke, who told me that he had never had the opportunity to speak with Clinton directly during the months that he was negotiating the Dayton peace accords in Bosnia, asked that I get hold of the president to pass along a message. Holbrooke said that he had information that the terrorists were planning another attack in Ridyah and that our troops were highly vulnerable.

"They are stuck in the same buildings the terrorists attacked last time," Holbrook told me. "All that has changed is that there are more formidable concrete barriers against car bombs. But a bigger bomb would be just as lethal. They need to be dispersed and camped in the desert in tents with a secured perimeter," he warned.

I called the president and passed along Holbrooke's message. He had no idea that the troops were still in the barracks and said that he had ordered them dispersed to the desert six weeks before. "I've got a meeting with the Joint Chiefs in the morning," the president said "I'll raise hell with them."

Shockingly, he was so little involved in protecting our troops - already the object of a terrorist attack - that he had no idea that his order had not been executed until I happened to call.

Clinton was a one-thing-at-a-time president. Capable of intense focus on the issue du jour, he neglected all back burner concerns. And terror was always on the back burner.

Throughout the first part of his second term, Clinton was immobilized by impeachment. Battling desperately to save his presidency, he simply had neither the time nor the mental energy to immerse himself in a war against terror. Blame him for the perjury that caused impeachment. Blame the GOP for pursuing him. Blame whoever you want, but we were without a president from January, 1998 until April, 1999.

Thereafter, his administration was almost wholly devoted to electing Hillary to the Senate and, to a lesser extent, to making Gore president. Once again, terrorism was not the priority.

It never was. Now it is.

papillonsartpalace.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (387553)4/7/2003 10:13:31 PM
From: SeachRE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Clinton is a shame. GWB is proving that now. As for your boy Kerry I've read your comments about how pretty he is...but he's a gold digger with a miserable character. If you really wanna be his intern...beware! I would never allow my daughter near him...



To: American Spirit who wrote (387553)4/7/2003 10:13:42 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Hill prober cites Clinton-era failures against al Qaeda

By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Covert intelligence operations against Osama bin Laden and military attacks during the Clinton administration failed to disrupt the al Qaeda network in Afghanistan, a congressional investigator told Congress yesterday.

Meanwhile, former FBI Director Louis J. Freeh defended the FBI and U.S. intelligence agencies from charges of intelligence failures and said the September 11 attacks probably could not have been prevented.

"The intelligence community and the FBI, in my opinion, does not appear to have had sufficient information to prevent the September 11 attacks," Mr. Freeh told a hearing of the joint House-Senate committee investigating intelligence failures.

It was the first time Mr. Freeh commented publicly on FBI counterterrorism amid charges by critics that the FBI and CIA failed to predict and stop the al Qaeda terrorist attacks that killed more than 3,000 people at the Pentagon and World Trade Center.

Earlier, Eleanor Hill, the joint committee staff director, disclosed for the first time that the Clinton administration mounted covert action programs against al Qaeda and bin Laden beginning in 1998, but both those operations and overt military strikes proved ineffective.

"None of these actions appear to have ultimately hindered terrorist training or al Qaeda's ability to operate from Afghanistan," Mrs. Hill said. She provided no details of the covert operations.

Other intelligence officials said one operation was a joint CIA effort with Pakistani military intelligence to capture bin Laden. The operation failed in part because of Pakistan's support for the Afghan Taliban movement, which was backing al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

The primary Clinton administration military action was the August 1998 attack on terrorist training camps in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. The factory was suspected of making chemical-weapons material for al Qaeda, but later was found only to have been making pharmaceuticals.

The cruise missile attack on Afghanistan failed to hit bin Laden who had fled from one camp before the attack and did little to disrupt terrorist training there.

The committee's review concluded that intelligence agencies made some improvements in fighting terrorism since the end of the Cold War, she said, but noted that "important gaps" in counterterrorism capabilities were never closed.

"These included many problems outside the control or the responsibility of the intelligence community, such as the sanctuary terrorists enjoyed in Afghanistan, and the legal limits on information sharing between intelligence and law enforcement officials," Mrs. Hill said.

U.S. intelligence agencies failed to learn from the lessons of past attacks, such as bombings in Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Tanzania and Yemen.

The lapses allowed al Qaeda to "exploit the gap in the U.S. counterterrorism structure to carry out its devastating attacks," she said.

Mrs. Hill blamed the FBI for a lack of aggressiveness inside the United States in pursuing terrorists.

"The FBI responded unevenly at home, with only some field offices devoting significant resources to al Qaeda," she said. "An overall assessment of the risk to America was not prepared, and much of the FBI's counterterrorism effort was concentrated abroad."

Mrs. Hill also said the National Security Agency (NSA), which conducts electronic eavesdropping, failed to help the FBI in intercepting communications inside the United States on foreign terrorists, thinking the FBI was responsible for that kind of spying.

Intelligence also lacked focus on terrorism because agencies were asked to spy on too many targets.

"The U.S. wanted to know everything about everything all the time," she said, noting that the NSA had 1,500 spying targets with 20,000 "essential elements" mandated by customers within the targets.

Regarding FBI counterterrorism efforts, Mr. Freeh said in testimony that he believes it is not possible to prevent all terrorist attacks.

"No agency or country — particularly in a democracy where the rule of law is respected — can be expected to foil and prevent every planned attack," he said.

Mr. Freeh blamed budget and personnel shortfalls and legal restriction on domestic activities for the FBI's inability to better prevent terrorist attacks.

FBI agents were prohibited from visiting the Internet sites of suspect groups or from attending public meetings of a target group. Also, counterspy and terrorism informant guidelines imposed years ago "curtailed our ability to collect information in national-security cases," he said.

washtimes.com