SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jim-thompson who wrote (388556)4/9/2003 9:11:47 AM
From: Rock_nj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Get off it. AS is not a racist for ignoring a minor candidate like Al Sharpton. Campaigns are run on a national level. Al Sharpton is not a contender on a national level. There is no reason to take him seriously. How do you know he's the leading candidate in NYC either? As I recall, Al Sharpton didn't win NYC in the NY Senate primary when he ran in 1992. I like Al Sharpton. He injects some realism into the campaign. But, he's certainly not a serious candidate, at least at this point, and anyone discussing the Democratic primary for President should consider him as such, regardless of his race.



To: jim-thompson who wrote (388556)4/9/2003 10:28:18 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769667
 
To the Democrats, black Americans are to be USED, and must remain QUIET.

The true black role models are Republicans. Why do the best and brightest blacks keep popping up around the Bush administration (the latest being Gen. Vince Brooks), while only the slimy liars (Sharpton) and morons (the Congressional Black Caucus) are tied to Democrats? I thought that party took pride in their "civil rights" positions.

When a Democrat hack points out that his party "OWNS" blacks, intelligent blacks should take that concept VERY literally...