SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lou Weed who wrote (91488)4/9/2003 10:43:51 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
MON,
Time will tell but at least we are all on the same page in one respect. We are rooting for the best outcome and the next stage of the debate will be on how best to secure this. You and Nadine may end up on the same side. I respect your earlier opposition to the war and concern about winning the peace. Several posters here have had intelligent objections, not the visceral anti-americanism of a Michael Moore. You and Steve Rodgers initially come to mind as such posters. Mike
PS First Questions would be role of exiles and the UN. I am not excited by either btw.



To: Lou Weed who wrote (91488)4/9/2003 1:39:48 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Michael,

I don't think I'm blind to the dangers of occupation (& I don't think the administration is either - it's just not something that it was good politics to stress). However, in any real-world calculus, they must be set against the dangers of leaving the bastard in place, both to us and to the Iraqis - can you say REAL humanitarian catastrophe - not that the UN ever exercises itself over the murders of dictators.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News