Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edscharp who wrote (3771)	4/9/2003 1:37:32 PM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50653

Or being "Bill Wexler" is yet another possibility. ND

To: Edscharp who wrote (3771)	4/9/2003 4:15:07 PM
From: inchingup	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50653

Ed: What is wrong with you? I am here to promote REFR not bury it. Heck, who wouldn't want to buy into a company who for 38 years has a track record of being a loser, insinuated umpteen times over a decade to have products out (which later turned out to be a terrible prognostication) and since supposedly bringing the first products to market had less income than it did in some years before product introduction. Add to that a management team who carefully crafted a plan to rape and pillage investors by the use of deceptive and misleading advertising and awarded themselves millions for simply promoting the stock while actually diluting the shares and costing investors millions, and you have a company that seems to be in the same class as ENE, Global Crossing, HLSH (pinks), and many other of our nations other well known corporations who investors lost billion of dollars by investing in. Maybe REFR will soon to become a household name like the above mentioned corporations and we can watch the perp walk live--one more time.