Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (11293)	4/9/2003 5:15:31 PM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Yes it will! nytimes.com <<Bush's War Message: Strong and Clear By R. W. APPLE Jr. ASHINGTON, April 8 — At least for the moment, the political planets seem to be sliding into alignment for President Bush, and he looked and sounded as if he knew it today when he appeared in Belfast, Northern Ireland, for a news conference with Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain. Mr. Bush was self-assured, blunt-spoken and aggressive. He betrayed not the slightest doubt about the decisions he has made on the war in Iraq so far or the ones he faces. "I hear a lot of talk here about how, you know, we're going to impose this leader or that leader," the president declared, as he and Mr. Blair stood behind a pair of lecterns. "Forget it. From day one we have said the Iraqi people are capable of running their own country. That's what we believe. The position of the United States of America is, the Iraqis are plenty capable of running Iraq, and that's precisely what's going to happen." The last time the two leaders met, at Camp David on March 27, Mr. Bush seemed almost diffident. He said little, allowing Mr. Blair to make the case for the war, and what he did say was completely eclipsed by the passion and the fluency of the prime minister's presentation. A lot has changed in the 12 days since then. As Mr. Bush spoke this morning, British troops moved almost unhindered through Basra, and American troops had thrown a noose around Baghdad. Infantrymen from the Third Division held a long stretch of the west bank of the Tigris River in the heart of the capital and several of Saddam Hussein's palaces. The Iraqi Planning and Information Ministries were burning. "Saddam Hussein clearly now knows I mean what I say," Mr. Bush said, confronting European skeptics with more than a touch of pugnacity. "People in Iraq will know we mean what we say when we talk about freedom." Military victory begets political strength. Mr. Bush has carried the country with him, and most of the second-guessers among Washington's policy experts are keeping their voices down these days. Many Americans, including many influential in the artistic and academic worlds, continue to denounce the president's policies, and an antiwar demonstration in Oakland, Calif., on Monday turned nasty when the police opened fire with rubber bullets. But the antiwar forces, who have had to contend from the start with the widespread belief that their position is unpatriotic and unsupportive of American troops engaged in deadly combat, must now bear the additional burden of arguing with success. American losses are relatively small: 96 dead to date, compared with 200 a day at the height of the Vietnam War. That this should be so despite stubborn Iraqi resistance not only in Baghdad but also elsewhere must rank as one of the major surprises of a surprising war. Those who expected light casualties expected the enemy to collapse. News of fierce fighting in Hilla, 50 miles south of Baghdad, and on the eastern and southern sides of the capital belies talk of collapse, though the ability of Iraqi commanders to control their forces is shrinking fast. Political leaders in several countries, pragmatists all, have begun to reposition themselves for the next phase of the drama in Iraq. Chancellor Gerhard Schröder of Germany and Presidents Jacques Chirac of France and Vladimir V. Putin of Russia are to meet in St. Petersburg this week to search for a common way forward, which will doubtless include a bid for rapprochement with Washington. They, too, have been reading the battlefield dispatches. Javier Solana, the European Union's secretary general, said the time had come "to turn the page." But winning a war is one thing; restoring order is another. Iraq's ambassador to the United Nations warned today that his people would never accept governance by foreigners, even for an interim period. Whether he is right or wrong will depend in considerable measure on how the temporary guarantors of civil peace, mostly American troops, do their work. An incident today in which an American tank fired on a Baghdad hotel where foreign journalists are staying, killing two cameramen, demonstrated a salient point.