Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (11367)	4/9/2003 6:01:14 PM
From: eims2000	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21614

So I guess if I see you soliciting kids for sex on a message board I have to sit back and just watch. I could not alert anyone? Because I would be invading your privacy. EVEN IF YOU POSTED THEM ON A PUBLIC MESSAGE BOARD! You see why that argument is stupid? You see why we didn't let Saddam continue to kill and torture his people and put toddlers in a kiddie prison? You see why we invaded his privacy? You see why we turned him into a 60 foot crater? I believe your story, if I didn't the posts would be on the way. Forget it. I believe you only say these nutty things here.:)

To: epicure who wrote (11367)	4/9/2003 6:24:20 PM
From: matthew (Hijacked)	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 21614

X We've had disagreements in the past, yet they remained on these boards. I really think that idiot has overstepped his bounds. Do you want me to take care of him? I've got friends. He won't be hard to find.

To: epicure who wrote (11367)	4/9/2003 11:34:32 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21614

Harass, offend, threaten, embarrass, distress or invade the privacy of any individual or entity; Goodness. How interesting. So, X....You have come around to the position that it is a violation of SI's TOU to harass or offend a fellow poster? And to embarrass or threaten one? (Like, to threaten to reveal private matters about one on SI?) And how about posting improper lies (lies are false btw, a TOU nono!) about a fellow poster for the purpose of causing distress to that poster, or embarrassment? Would you now think that is a violation of the TOU? Would you now side with those SI members who were the victims of the above TOU-violating behaviors, or would you still jump in on the side of the threatening, fabulating, offending harasser, avidly joining his campaign, ridiculing and inflicting distress on his victims? Do tell me what your current position is on whether it is a violation of the TOU to Harass, offend, threaten, embarrass, distress or post inappropriately, improperly or falsely to a fellow SI member. You may owe a couple of people an apology, I'm thinking. It's heartening to know that people do sometimes reassess, though. infospace.com