To: spiral3 who wrote (91690 ) 4/10/2003 11:07:19 AM From: Sun Tzu Respond to of 281500 Neat! I am glad to see a few people here are expanding their news sources. Let me answer your important questions first and then I have few grub to point out about the article <g>. The bad news is that everyone in the region mistrusts America and if you are perceived as being aligned with America, you loose all credibility. So direct support of the opposition is a very bad idea. The good news is that if we play it smart, there is plenty of indirect support that we can provide. One of the things that is little understood is that the Iranian regime is not according to Islam in its structure. So there are a large number of Shia clerics who are most disappointed by it. They feel that the regime has dishonored Islam. As to the issue of separation of Church and State, although Islam has a comprehensive socio-economic-political system that can be taken as the only way to govern, there are equally compelling reasons for an Islamist not to want such a government. This is because at least in the Shia sect, it is fundamental that the people are allowed to choose their leader. And because if you combine this fundamental choice with that of the political leader the natural result is disintegration of the country, most Islamists actually favor separation of Church and State on the condition that the government is not anti-Islam (read will not pursue policies or pass legislations that directly negate explicit edicts of Islam). One of the best ways to promote the fall of Theocracy in Iran is to indirectly help this group of Islamists. Now let's move on to the grubs <g> > An Open Letter To Hojjatoleslam Mr. Ali Khameneh'i This is an insult to Khamenei <vbg> He is calling Khamenei by his "academic" rank. The situation is analogous to a colonel who through a coup d'eta takes charge and then gives himself the rank of 4-star field marshal. Now someone is addressing him as colonel again. > I have written these lines for the satisfaction of God, the defense of justice, your notification, 'permit the right and prohibit the evil' Here he is reading Khamenei chapter and verse from Koran and notifying him according to the writer's religious duty. It is as much a covering ones behind as it is another insult to Khamenei (basically it is my religious duty to preach to you, you are too dumb to know on your own oh great leader). > ...the joining of the Iraqi tyrant in the endless "dustbin of history" with other world’s dictators... This passage is a direct reference to the Iranian revolution. "dustbin of history" was the exact phrase used by the revolutionaries to describe where Shah's regime belonged. The author is basically reminding Khamenei that he is in the same league as Shah and Saddam because the people are not behind him. > The Iranians are afraid that with Mr. Ahmad Chalabi, the leader of the Washington-backed Iraqi National Congress (INC) – a prominent banker of Shi’a faith -- already "parachuted" by the Americans in the southern city of Nasseriyeh in the one hand and Hojjatoleslam Abdolmajid Kho’i, a senior Shi’a cleric already in the holly city of Najaf on the other, their protégé, Ayatollah Mohammad Baqer al-Hakim would be seated at a backbench in the future Iraqi Administration in Baghdad. Chalabi is our yes man (don't want to argue this). But the other two are not. They are just against the Islamic regime on the grounds that its structure is unIslamic (see my starting notes). The point here is that if Iraq is ruled by Chalabi and the other Islamists support him, then the regime in Iran is under threat on two fronts: those of more pure and less authoritarian Islamists and those of more pro-American politicians. It remains to be seen if that can happen because to achieve that, we have to effectively back the "good" Islamists as an alternative to Iran's hardliners. Sun Tzu [edit: OK may be Chalabi is not a comlete yes-man, but he is not of the pure independent mind either]