Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (6158)	4/14/2003 10:34:56 AM
From: brian h	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12245

""Understandable if you're not too thrilled about the America 70% of us recognize."" A new round of chemical weapons.....liberation.....attack...lawless...looting....rebiulding a remote country....a new target How many will be supporting Bush if he and his bulldog Donald start attacking (or liberating if one insists)again? How much tax money can American afford these recurring "free" war spending? How about my American economy? ---------------------------------- Bush turns his sights on Syria By Marian Wilkinson, Herald Correspondent in Washington April 15 2003 Syria became the potential new flashpoint in the Middle East yesterday when the United States accused Iraq's neighbour of possessing weapons of mass destruction and harbouring fleeing members of Saddam Hussein's regime. The US President, George Bush, said "we believe there are chemical weapons in Syria" and his Administration claimed the country encouraged suicide bombers to attack allied forces in Iraq. Damascus emphatically denied the charges, but concern is growing in Syria that the US will attack it next. Only days earlier, Mr Bush's Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld, singled out Syria and Iran, warning they could be next in line for retribution as the US pursued its global fight against terrorism. Washington has long accused Syria of being one of the prime exponents of state-sponsored terrorism. ------------------------------------------ BH