Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Shread who wrote (71128)	4/10/2003 5:52:13 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

20? We have had nearly that many reports of positive findings.

To: Paul Shread who wrote (71128)	4/11/2003 8:57:51 AM
From: Logain Ablar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Paul: OTOT This will take time for US operations to confirm. The inbedded reporters report on real time while operations waits to make sure the site is tested and confirmed. We should know about the ones discovered last week by middle of next week. It will be ongoing. To illustrate the confusion. The nuclear facility written yesterday by an enbedded paper news reporter and then reported by Fox news and NBC. 1) The US Marine (maybe it was army 101st air) nuclear detectors were off the scale (meaning its deadly but doesn't mean its weapons grade)) 2) The the UN inspectors indicated they've inspected the site and the marines broke seals they had in place. 3) The marines indicted their find was from below ground. 4) The UN inspectors didn't know there was underground facilities, only above ground. Just another point indicating the level of deception taking place. Imagine the consequences IF US troups didn't invade and instead pulled out of Kuwait with the lifting of sanctions.