SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike M who wrote (12233)4/11/2003 11:38:08 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614
 
A DICTATOR FALLS...AND OLD EUROPE MOURNS

by William Grim, Iconoclast Contributing Editor
iconoclast.ca



Munich, Germany -- The sweep of history is defined by grand gestures. The little Japanese diplomat in top hat and morning coat who limped aboard the USS Missouri to sign the instrument of surrender in World War II was dwarfed not only by the size of the ship's 16-inch guns, but also by the physical dimensions of the victorious allies. And when Soviet troops blasted off the swastika from atop Hitler's Chancellery building in Berlin it was the loud last conclusive act to that deadliest of European wars.

But the small gestures are as important, and perhaps even more indicative of public sentiment, than the grand displays when it come to symbolizing the shift from one historical epoch to another.

Just the other day at the Munich Central Train Station I had some time on my hands and decided to watch the news on a big screen overhead TV projector that is located in the station's main concourse. There was a large crowd of at least 50 persons assembled as the TV was showing the latest news about the War in Iraq.

I started up a conversation with a British gentleman and expressed to him my gratitude for Britain's strong support and the bravery and professionalism of her soldiers. An elderly man overheard us talking and asked in broken English is we were American or British. It turned out that the man was an Iraqi exile whose family had been devastated by Saddam's evil regime. When he found out that he was talking with a Brit and a Yank he was effusive in his praise of our two countries.

Then the big screen showed the now iconic footage of a British tank pulling down a giant statue of Saddam in Bosra. And here's the small gesture I was talking about that tells us so much about the present state of the world: An Iraqi, a Brit and a Yank who had been complete strangers until a few minutes before were united in a vicarious brotherhood, celebrating not just victory, but victory over palpable evil. And surrounding us were about 50 persons whose faces displayed disbelief and shock at what they were seeing. Not only was the Coalition shown to be victorious, but the TV was also displaying Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schroeder's worst nightmare: Hundreds of ordinary Iraqi wildly cheering on their British liberators.

A dictator falls...and Old Europe mourns.

The scene I witnessed at the train station says more about the morally feeble condition of Old Europe than all of the pontifications of all of the pundits combined. Old Europeans were actually sad that a vicious dictator was being defeated and that America and her Allies were winning the war.

Déjà vu? Perhaps. Old Europe does have a long-standing love affair with despots and dictators. But to be charitable, I'd say that the Old European gloom and doom has less to do with love for Saddam than it has with the Old European Old Left's hatred of America.

If McDonald's golden arch is the most ubiquitous logo in Old Europe, the image of Che Guevara is a close second. One of the ironies of the so-called "peace" movement in Old Europe is that it is dominated by people who proudly carry banners emblazoned with Guevara's image.

Now, you might well ask, how does Che Guevara, a brutal Stalinist killer, come to symbolize "peace" for the Old Europeans? Just think back to Orwell's famous formulation in 1984: "War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength." There you have it. The ultimate triumph of deconstruction.

The Old European Old Left has been pretty effective in appropriating the propaganda techniques perfected by Joseph Goebbels. Anyone who opposes terrorism is labeled a terrorist; anyone who opposes a dictator is labeled a dictator; and anyone who is politically to the right of Che Guevara is labeled a right-wing extremist. And of course, it goes without saying that to Old Europeans, George W. Bush is far worse than Hitler, Stalin, Mao or Pol Pot.

But the Old European Old Left finds itself in the same predicament as Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, the former Iraqi Minister of Information (better known to North Americans as Baghdad Bob). The lies may work for a long time, but when you continue to shout that "the American infidels are nowhere near Bagdad" when American tanks can be seen patrolling in the background, even the most committed leftist ideologue has to wonder if maybe there's something wrong with both the messenger and the message.

Americans are going to have to get used to the fact that no matter how much good we accomplish in the world, or how many people we liberate, we will never enjoy the respect, gratitude, support or even grudging admiration of a large percentage of the citizenry of Old Europe. So be it.

But you almost have to feel sorry for the Old Left of Old Europe. The Soviet Union and her satellites are no more, and communism in Red China and Vietnam is about to disintegrate in a mad dash towards capitalism. Only Cuba, Berkeley (California) and the University of Paris are still incontrovertibly within the Old Leftist camp. The only weapons left in the arsenal of the Old European Old Left are vituperation, character assassination and the propaganda of lies and libels.

So let the Old European Old Left rant on and on. A picture is worth 10,000 rants, especially when the picture is of Iraqis cheering their "infidel" liberators.

William E. Grim is a writer who lives in Germany and is a native of Columbus, Ohio. and you can read more by him at The Official William E. Grim Web Site.



To: Mike M who wrote (12233)4/11/2003 4:22:54 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 21614
 

Only Jennings Ignores Pro-Troops Rally in New York City

Media Resource Center ^ | April 11, 2003

No anti-war protest has been too small to earn coverage from ABC's Peter Jennings who in recent months has highlighted anti-war events involving just a few hundred people, a “virtual” protest and even one guy who jumped off a bridge,

but on Thursday night, while CBS and NBC noted a pro-troops rally featuring 15,000 in New York City, Jennings could not manage to mention it on World News Tonight.

CNN, FNC and MSNBC all covered some of the April 10 event live in the noon hour and later included it in their hourly or more rundowns of the day's events. CNBC's The News with Brian Williams, but anchored by Forrest Sawyer, also highlighted it.

CBS Evening News anchor Harry Smith noted it, though he felt compelled to explain what he apparently thought viewers would find a foreign notion, that many see the war in Iraq as part of the battle against terrorism: “Here in New York City, thousands of trade union workers and firefighters rallied at Ground Zero in support of American troops fighting in Iraq. Speakers and many in the crowd see the war in Iraq as part of the war on terror which began after the attack on the World Trade Center on September 11th, 2001.”

As Smith talked, viewers could hear those rallying chant, “USA, USA!” CBS showcased a sign proclaiming: “We Gave Peace a Chance, We Got 9/11! Support Our Troops!!”

Tom Brokaw managed to squeeze in a 6-second item on the April 10 NBC Nightly News, announcing over video of a sea of waving U.S. flags: “In New York, tens of thousands gathered near Ground Zero to show support for the U.S. troops in Iraq.”

The event featured New York Governor George Pataki and former Senator Bob Dole. An AP story pegged attendance at 15,000: “The rally stretched for several blocks north from the World Trade Center site. Carpenters, electricians and firefighters carried American flags and homemade signs and chanted USA! USA!' Police and organizers estimated the crowd at more than 15,000. The rally was sponsored by the Building & Construction Trades Council of Greater New York.”

Read the AP story by Michael Weissenstein in full as posted on Yahoo.com.

Jennings couldn't even find six seconds for the rally which took place just a few miles south of the ABC News headquarters, but he did find two minutes for a look at how an Iman in Detroit had a warning for the Bush administration. Jennings noted that in the Detroit suburbs Iraqis “are celebrating, but they also have a message for the Bush administration.”

Reporter Dean Reynolds acknowledged that “it would be an understatement to say people in this neighborhood are happy Saddam is finished” but, highlighting Iman Husham Al-Husainy of the Karbalaa Islamic Center, Reynolds passed along how he says U.S. policy “should concentrate on dealing with nations instead of autocratic rulers and he believes that would send a strong signal to Iraq's Arab neighbors.”

Those against the war haven't had to gather a lot of people for Jennings to consider their cause newsworthy:

-- From the October 25 CyberAlert: It doesn’t take much to arouse Peter Jennings’ interest -- if you’re left-wingers protesting Bush. Jennings found the time to highlight and show video of a mere 200 anti-Bush protestors. Jennings reported on the October 24 World News Tonight: “More than 200 people demonstrated outside the President's ranch in Crawford, Texas today. They say they wanted the President to focus on issues affecting the poor and the working class and they were escorted away by police.” From the video, it was barely 200. Amongst the signs held up by these average Americans: “President Bush & VP Cheney: People's Need, Not Corporate Greed.” “Wanted: [Bush/Cheney photo] “For Corporate Greed” Looked more anti-Bush/Cheney than pro-poor.

-- From the February 27 CyberAlert, a “virtual” protest which neither the CBS or NBC evening shows found newsworthy: Jennings intoned on the February 26 World News Tonight: “In Washington today, thousands of people opposed to war against Iraq bombarded the Senate and the White House with phone calls, faxes and e-mails. They called it a virtual march on the Capitol. Communications were virtually paralyzed in the Senate for a while. Many congressional phone lines were jammed for several hours and one Senator reported 18 times more e-mail than usual.” For more see the February 27, 2003 CyberAlert.

-- From the March 6 CyberAlert: Jennings went out of his way to make anti-war demonstrators appear more well-rounded and reasonable. Highlighting some protests on college campuses, Jennings stressed on World News Tonight that “while the students oppose war,” they made “a point of saying they support homeland security but believe the government should be focusing on jobs, security and health care, as well.” For details see the March 6, 2003 CyberAlert.

-- From the March 17 CyberAlert, Jennings hyped a small protest as he anchored World News Tonight/Sunday the night of the Azores summit: Over video of a small protest, Jennings announced: “There were, as there are somewhere every day now, some demonstrations against the war. In Chicago, among other places, several thousand people gathered in Daley Plaza, religious, labor and community leaders among them. Several speakers said the war would cost billions of dollars the country needs for schools and for health care.”

For more on Jennings' anti-war spin that night see the March 17, 2003 CyberAlert.

-- From the March 20 CyberAlert: Jennings demonstrated that no anti-war demonstration is too small for him to consider it newsworthy as he picked up on a solitary effort: “And in San Francisco, a man apparently leaped to his death from the Golden Gate Bridge. Our affiliate there, KGO, reports that he read an anti-war statement before jumping.”

When the war began, Jennings displayed his sympathy for the anti-war cause:

-- From the March 21 CyberAlert: ABC and Peter Jennings displayed a special zeal for the cause of those against the war. Jennings bemoaned how “it's going to be very difficult for people who are opposed to the war to debate it now that the forces are in combat," pleaded with Senator Joe Biden that those opposed are looking “to members of the Democratic Party” to be “their port in a storm....What happens to them at the moment?" See the entire March 21, 2003 CyberAlert item.

-- From the March 22 CyberAlert: Jennings rued to David Gergen that the administration has a “tendency” to “pretend” anti-war protests are not happening. Gergen agreed and then worried that since “Iraq is putting up so little resistance,” the U.S. will appear to “have been a bully.” Jennings largely tossed softballs to two anti-war group leaders, such as: “Why do you feel so strongly about this war?” And he saw an inadequate level of activism: “The college campus appears rather quiescent to some.” See the entire March 22, 2003 CyberAlert item.

-- For a rundown of how ABC and Peter Jennings hyped the larger anti-liberation of Iraq protests, distorted their “diversity” and ignored the true agenda of organizers, scroll down to the “Sanitizing Radical Protesters” section in the MRC's Special Report by Tim Graham, “Peter's Peace Platoon: ABC's Crusade Against 'Arrogant' American Power.” Read the entire Special Report.