SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: g_w_north who wrote (167558)4/11/2003 4:25:35 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1594128
 
gw,

You have not addressed my points, which is that the Hall of Fame has the same freedom of speech, freedom to decide what is said on its behalf, from its podium.

When a company hires a receptionist, she can answer the telephone "This is XYZ corporation, can I help you" or whatever the company tells her to say. When a company hires a speaker, they can agree in the contract on a guideline of what he can say from company's podium. If a speaker has a history of being a volatile, or for violating contractual obligations, the company has a freedom to fire the receptionist, or not to hire the speaker.

As far as this being a decision of one person, I have no idea how the Baseball Hall of Fame operates, and how executive decisions are made, and it is irrelevant. Relevant fact is, does the organization has a right of free speech. The organization has decided that it does not want to oppose war or promote drugs. If there is anything out there compelling them to sponsor speech they oppose, it means there is no freedom of speech for them.

Joe