Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (167603)	4/11/2003 7:45:38 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1583937

His argument is based on the premise that Saddam was behind 9/11. Not really. Only that Saddam supported terror and that he may have eventually done so in a more dangerous way if we didn't stop him. I misunderstood his premise. I just don't like his analogies. The Iraqi war is like other wars; the war on terrorism is not. Comparing the war on terrorism with WWII doesn't just doesn't compute for me. Besides, we are better at Iraqi-like wars than on the kind of war the war on terrorism is. Furthermore, Bush's personality type is better at Iraqi-like wars. ted