Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony Yeung (Hijacked) who wrote (12705)	4/12/2003 6:58:21 PM
From: Edscharp	Respond to of 21614

Yeung, "What do you think of Barry's pro-American stand as long as it doesn't interfere with Israeli objectives?" Quite honestly I haven't been following Barry's posts quite as closely as I have followed Jaeger's posts. I see from his bio that his very pro-zionist. I would answer your inquiry in this manner. I would like to see a Palestinian state for Palestinians. I would also like to see an Israeli state that is secure from terror. I believe it is of grave importance to the peace of the region that both sides come to a negotiated agreement. Towards that end both sides will have to compromise on some issues. I recognize that there are some hotspot issues where compromise will be difficult and, I'll go out on a limb here, would suggest that those particular areas where agreement can not be reached should be 'temporarily' administrated and held in trust by by an international force (Nato, UN, whatever)until such time when the two sides can agree. I know it's not a compromise that will make either side happy, but it's better than bloodshed and creating more hatred in the region. I know absolutely that my above suggestion will be unacceptable to Jaeger. He is a racist. Compromise isn't possible for him. Barry is free to express his views for or against as he sees fit.