SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: portage who wrote (31399)4/12/2003 9:51:58 PM
From: sciAticA errAticA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
re: but why no mention of Pakistan

I agree that the omission is most curious.

Musharraf is indeed vulnerable, and growing more so.

Certainly the greatest potential danger to US interests in the region.

But then, Pak has nukes... and as the region (and world) has well learned, this is the ONLY protection from US hegemony and aggression.

Is it simply not included in the study because the US is impotent to act?



To: portage who wrote (31399)4/13/2003 3:28:42 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net  Respond to of 74559
 
>>Interesting article, but why no mention of Pakistan ? << What corner is the author coming from (even Strafor is human)? (admittedly the usual shoot-the-messenger approach)

Note that India got attention from US in terms of the Kashmir conflict, so the article can be understood as an integral part of the spin, given the world by the Ministry of Truth.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News