Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (167701)	4/13/2003 10:56:17 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 1583507

Well now, it's a small world isn't it? The protesting group supporters and organizers in America: nyspc.net internationalanswer.org Both socialist organizations against the liberation of Iraq. Now the good part... Saddam's Baath party is a socialist party. damascus-online.com The Baath Party was from the beginning a secular Arab nationalist party. Socialism (not Marxism) was quickly adopted as the party’s economic dogma: “Unity [Arab], Freedom [from colonialism], and Socialism” are still the watchwords. From its earliest development, the motivation behind Baathist political thought and its leading supporters was the need to produce a means of reasserting the Arab spirit in the face of foreign domination. Moral and cultural deterioration, it was felt, had so weakened the Arabs that Western supremacy spread throughout the Middle East. Arabs needed a regeneration of the common heritage of people in the region to drive off debilitating external influences. So the socialists in the United States were against the war to liberate Iraq from their fellow socialist brother Saddam. That was too easy! Steve

To: tejek who wrote (167701)	4/13/2003 11:20:53 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1583507

You were never a liberal. You don't know me from Adam, and you certainly don't know what I was or was not 25 years ago. Today's liberals are, in many instances, slime held over from the Clinton administration, with no moral compass, only what they think is a political one. We oppose pre-emptive war for good reason. Yes, and when pre-emptive war is necessary to protect the American people from anti-American terrorists, what exactly IS your reason for not supporting it?