Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (13165)	4/14/2003 12:37:47 AM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Hold on TP...You may be a little premature with your prognostications. In any event, the world is a safer place without your buddy Saddam running Iraq. Just ask any Iraqi not affiliated with the regime running for their lives. One thing that was found was hundreds of explosive vests. These things have only one use and that is for terrorism. Re:<<Was Iraq a threat to it's neighbors? >> Yes. A little early to be proclaiming the failure to find chemical weapons. The proliferation of chemical protective equipment suggests the Iraqis were expecting to require their use. Since US no longer has chemical weapons, what does that tell you? Re:<<Was Iraq a threat to the United States? >> Iraq was a threat to the world. Saddam has twice been caught trying to build nuclear weapons. He is one of the few who has ever used gas on his own people let alone anyone else. He pays terrorists' families a bounty for US or Israeli terrorism. Of course he was a threat. Take your head out of your fourth point of contact and use it for a change.