Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (93478)	4/14/2003 1:17:20 PM
From: FaultLine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

just as some food for thought. oh I don't think anyone denied existence of the camp, it's just the 'what does it all mean', this is where the differences are. The votes are still out as far as I have seen. Nothing new yet, right? The Limbaugh thing? Nothing to do with that story -- just didn't want his opinions aired here... --fl

To: greenspirit who wrote (93478)	4/14/2003 4:56:02 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 281500

The New Yorker had an article on Salman Pak over a year ago. But there was nothing in the WaPo or the NYT.

To: greenspirit who wrote (93478)	4/14/2003 7:23:12 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

What a crock. Every stupid WMD story has been dutifully echoed at your chosen "alternative media sources" , and every one so far has proven to be, shall we say, exaggerated, charitably speaking anyway. You can read that crap if you want, you can dutifully echo it here too, just don't make out like you actually know something from reading your chosen "alternative media sources". Well, you can do that too, but you may as well join Nadine in preaching the usefulness of Debka if you're going to spew garbage like that. Tremendous value, indeed, if you need to fertilize the back 40 anyway.