SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (93484)4/14/2003 2:02:08 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I believe the Salmon Pak information was too important to be censored. Especially, when the sources were eventually backed up by other alternative media outlets.

Michael, I'm a bit confused. Are you talking about Ken's dislike for Limbaugh or are you arguing the Salman Pak information was censored in the media at large? If it's the latter, I don't think so. I saw it in more than one place, including in The New Yorker. As for what it all meant, seems to me that's what the debate is about.



To: greenspirit who wrote (93484)4/14/2003 6:44:41 PM
From: FaultLine  Respond to of 281500
 
I also believe there are rare moments, when information should be shared regardless of the source.

as far as I can remember, all the known facts, and they were precious few, were completely aired and discussed here. Has anything new come up?

--fl


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News