SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LPS5 who wrote (5409)4/14/2003 7:44:11 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13056
 
If a state can incarcerate your for 50 years and still be libertarian then I don't see why a state can't kill you and still be libertarian. I would think that its more an issue of what gets the death penalty, or other severe penalty or any penalty at all. If the state controls very little, but does give the death penalty for murder it would seem to be an example of a minimalist state that in no way contradicts the tenents of libertarianism. Even if it is somehow seen as a violation of those tenents, I can't see how it rises to some special absolute standard that is more against libertarian thought then any other government action.

We might have to just agree to disagree on this.

Anyone else have an opinion on the subject?

Tim



To: LPS5 who wrote (5409)4/14/2003 8:05:45 PM
From: Wildstar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13056
 
Is your objection to the death penalty a consequential one? Or do you believe that death can never be punishment, no matter who administers it?