Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (17182)	4/14/2003 9:51:14 PM
From: Softechie	Respond to of 89467

They also found bunch of WMD along with these materials... <font size=20>CAMELS BALLS!

To: Sully- who wrote (17182)	4/14/2003 9:56:13 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

capable of biological and chemical uses, So what does that mean? It sounds like they found some boxes full of documents and microscopes. Most likely they were placed in bunkers to keep them from getting blown up. It doesn't sound like they were hidden what with being marked and obvious to passing troops who needed no local informants to find them. TP

To: Sully- who wrote (17182)	4/14/2003 10:00:37 PM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Could you speak up. Don't be shy. We're all friends in America, and we share the love worldwide. Perhaps we'll share a little love in Syria next. I remain, SOROS p.s. Still can't help but be amazed how that idiot/genius built and transported that bomb in Oklahoma a few years back, and then raced out of town in a vehicle with no plates and a big sign on it that said, "Let's go to Hooters and celebrate my bombing in OK." I think Saddam should have been taken out, but you need to do a little thinking for yourself and stop buying everything that comes out of a Dick, a Bush, or a Colon (sp). In fact, generally, it's a good practice to avoid all three emissions. However, any of the three I'd trust more than something even more "Gor (e)y.

To: Sully- who wrote (17182)	4/15/2003 11:38:33 AM
From: Sojourner Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

I found it very disturbing that the critics won't even look at the evidence. Last week when CNN head stated he held back reporting Saddam's horrible acts, the critics were silent again. If the critics stated that they felt there was better way without war and admitted the what Saddam was up to, then the critics might have some credibility. I really question the character of anyone who denies what Saddam was doing, considering the UN tapes, the defectors statement, and the hard evidence that has been building.