SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wildstar who wrote (5421)4/15/2003 9:21:57 PM
From: Gulo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13056
 
WVa isn't the only jurisdiction to lose surgeons over malpractice suits. Perhaps the electorate in those states will ask their politicians to limit liability, akin to "good Samaritan" laws that protect civilians. That doesn't seem too radical to me. What would you propose?
-g

BTW, the problem with private law and justice is that not everyone will subscribe to the same system, resulting in extraordinary conflict. A major role of law is not just to distinguish good from bad behavior. It is to provide a rulebook to play the game by. Most rules can be perfectly arbitrary (drive on the right hand side, red means stop, etc.), but they have to be the same for everyone.

Even though I count myself solidly in the libertarian camp, I do believe that a civilization can be measured by the strength of its institutions. Justice is the major one of those institutions that defines a society.



To: Wildstar who wrote (5421)4/16/2003 9:38:47 AM
From: LPS5  Respond to of 13056
 
The issue concerning West Virginia physicians and malpractice premiums is akin to that of corporations leaving the U.S. to domicile their HQs in more tax-friendly places; Bermuda and the Caymans, most commonly.

In both cases, I support the decision to vote with ones' feet unqualifiedly.

LPS5