Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (174116)	4/16/2003 10:26:47 AM
From: DaYooper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

The Great Lakes also started descending to extremely low levels, nearly historic, around that very same time as well. great-lakes.net Hmmmmm. You may be on to something.

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (174116)	4/16/2003 11:08:51 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"The markets headed down about the time Bush was nominated." You must think we're stoopid and can't look at a chart. The Nasdaq started down in the Spring of 2000 with 9 months left in Clintons term. Not that anyone is blaming Clinton.

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (174116)	4/18/2003 7:42:48 AM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

OT ... Charles, re "The markets headed down about the time Bush was nominated." I'm glad you pointed that out. It's about time somebody set the record straight. Everybody else seems to think that the recent market crash was due to the market bubble. Well, that's the way it appears on the surface. But when one digs deeper, as you apparently have, it becomes obvious that President Bush triggered the crash. In fact, the markets -- in their predictive, prescient fashion -- anticipated the nomination of President Bush and caused the bubble, just so that he would have something to burst. <g> Ron