SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (1716)4/16/2003 7:16:31 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Respond to of 10965
 
Kerry Leads Democratic Hopefuls in Funds Raised

washingtonpost.com

By Thomas B. Edsall and Sarah Cohen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, April 16, 2003; Page A07

Of all the Democratic presidential primary contestants, Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.) has by far the most money in the bank, $8.1 million, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission yesterday.

His closest competitor is Sen. John Edwards (N.C.), with $5.74 million. Edwards raised the most money during the past quarter, $7.4 million, and his support among trial lawyers was crucial. Edwards, a trial lawyer himself, raised 55 percent of his money from lawyers. Edwards raised $1 million in Texas and $305,000 in Alabama, two states with large and active trial lawyer constituencies.

Edwards did far better than any of the candidates in the South, which provided him with almost half of his total.

In cash on hand, Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.) was in third place, with $4.95 million. Well behind these campaigns were those of former Vermont governor Howard Dean, with $2.1 million, and Sen. Joseph I . Lieberman (Conn.), with $1.78 million.

Sen. Bob Graham (Fla.), who formed his campaign committee in late February, reported raising $1.1 million, almost 90 percent of it from Florida. Graham was by far the most frugal of all the major candidates, spending $12,482.

Kerry and Gephardt benefited heavily from their ability to transfer money from their Senate and House campaign funds. Kerry transferred $3 million and Gephardt $2.4 million.

Both Kerry and Edwards were dependent on contributors who gave the maximum amount allowed by law: $2,000. Edwards raised $4.8 million, or nearly 65 percent of his total, in $2,000 contributions. Kerry raised $3.9 million in $2,000 contributions, or 55 percent of his total for the quarter.

In net money raised during the past three months, excluding transfers and earlier fundraising, Edwards led with $7.4 million to Kerry's $7 million, Gephardt's $3.5 million, Lieberman's $3 million and Dean's $2.6 million.

The Kerry, Edwards, Gephardt and Lieberman campaigns showed in dramatic terms how much increasing the maximum contribution from $1,000 to $2,000 has changed the competition for money, greatly empowering candidates with access to donors who can write the bigger checks.

For Lieberman, more than 60 percent -- or $1.9 million out of the $3 million he raised -- was made up of contributions of $2,000. Only 13 percent of Lieberman's money was raised in contributions of less than $1,000. For Gephardt, 57 percent of the money arrived as $2,000 contributions; 14 percent was in amounts less than $1,000.

If the limit were still $1,000 and they had the same number of maximum-contribution donors, Edwards would have raised about $3 million less, Kerry would have raised about $2.5 million less and Lieberman would have raised about $1.25 million less.

Dean, who has been running a campaign geared in part to smaller donors, raised $530,000 -- or 20 percent of his $2.6 million raised last quarter -- in $2,000 contributions. Dean had by far the largest percentage of small donations, many received through direct mail or via the Internet. A total of $760,891 -- or 29 percent -- of Dean's contributions was in amounts less than $250, and 60 percent in amounts less than $1,000.

Gephardt, who is seeking to capitalize on the Washington connections he built while he was Democratic leader of the House, is accepting money from political action committees. According to his report, he received $172,000 from PACs, many of them union PACs. Lieberman reported receiving $50,600 from PACs.

In addition to the amount of money raised and cash in the bank, one of the key figures is the rate of spending, indicating how fast a candidate is likely to deplete reserves and run into spending limits if the candidate plans to accept public financing in the primary.

If Graham was the most frugal candidate in the first quarter, as a percentage of what he raised, Lieberman was the most profligate. He spent about 41 percent of the money raised in that period. Kerry spent about 29 percent of what he raised, Dean about 27 percent and Edwards about 23 percent.

In actual dollars, Kerry led the field in spending, with $2 million in disbursements during the first quarter. He spent about $470,000 for campaign salaries, $41,000 for political and other consulting fees, $222,000 for catering, $175,000 on travel expenses and $71,000 for telemarketing.

Edwards was second in spending, with $1.68 million gone.

Lieberman spent $1.2 million. According to his report, Lieberman spent $570,000 on salaries plus more than $155,000 for political, research and communications consulting fees.

Kerry raised almost half of his money in two states: Massachusetts and California. He hauled in about $1.7 million from Massachusetts donors and reaped dividends from many trips to California over the past two years, raising $1.5 million there from January through March.

The detailed reports show interesting patterns of contributions. Dean, a medical doctor, raised $81,500 from physicians, and he also raised nearly $60,000 from educators and students.

Kerry received $1 million from attorneys, including $46,000 from the law firm of Skadden, Arps. He also raised $17,000 from contributors at Harvard University but just $250 from contributors who listed their employer as the Heinz Foundation, which is run by his wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry.

Lieberman picked up more than $415,000 from attorneys and $85,000 from physicians.

Gephardt raised about $600,000 from attorneys and $42,000 from Anheuser-Busch. He also listed as contributors a half-dozen journalists who traveled on his announcement tour and reimbursed the campaign for travel expenses. A campaign official said that was a mistake and would be corrected.

Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (Ohio) reported raising $180,000 and spending $130,000. Former Illinois senator Carol Moseley Braun raised $72,000 and spent $27,000. Al Sharpton's campaign had not filed a report as of late last night.

Staff writer Dan Balz and researchers Lucy Shackelford, Madonna Lebling and Margot Williams contributed to this report.

© 2003 The Washington Post Company



To: American Spirit who wrote (1716)4/16/2003 7:52:07 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 10965
 
>>Kerry accepts no special interest money and never has.

And how would YOU know that to be a fact?! Wake up and stop being such a putz!



To: American Spirit who wrote (1716)4/16/2003 9:16:45 AM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 10965
 
a few observations:

Kerry......benefited heavily from their ability to transfer money from their Senate and House campaign funds. Kerry transferred $3 million .....

money given, not meant to spend on a failed presidential race....but who is kerry to care....

In actual dollars, Kerry led the field in spending, with $2 million in disbursements during the first quarter. He spent about $470,000 for campaign salaries, $41,000 for political and other consulting fees,

pretty amazing that UAS thinks it will be Liveshot in a cakewalk...yet kerry has to spend over a 1/4 of his money to get people to talk him up and coach him.....

Kerry raised almost half of his money in two states: Massachusetts and California...

Imagine that......Taxachusetts and Squirrleywood his two biggest cash cows.....LOL

Kerry received $1 million from attorneys, including $46,000 from the law firm of Skadden, Arps.

....of course Liveshot kerry accepts no special interest money, just as UAS says.....



To: American Spirit who wrote (1716)4/16/2003 11:27:02 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 10965
 
John Kerry a true hypocrite - Message 18847245



To: American Spirit who wrote (1716)4/16/2003 3:34:47 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
The fact is that the core Republican constituencies -- white men, rural people, small businessmen -- are being slowly but surely overtaken by a Democratic coalition of women, minorities, service workers and a new class of college-educated professionals, one more concerned with social justice and less likely to reflexively vote by tax bracket than the old doctor-lawyer-executive elite. In the post-industrial age, demography favors Democrats: The numbers of "Reagan Democrats" -- blue-collar workers who helped boost the GOP in key mid-Atlantic industrial states -- are shrinking, while the new professional class and the service class, which both skew Democratic, are growing. Iraq and the war on terrorism can impede the Dems' eventual triumph, but they can't stop it.
salon.com.
( I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS WAS EVER WRITTEN.} More Dem's are re registering as repulpicans than ever before. They have lost their faith in the party and its leadership. They are even losing the immigrants to the republican party, and all it took was Clinton, Carter, Kerry, Pelosi, Kucinich,Dacshole and Edwards opening their mouths.....
The truth will set you free! JMHO



To: American Spirit who wrote (1716)4/19/2003 1:44:31 PM
From: Volsi Mimir  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Hey Whack........Kerry who?
Democratic presidential candidates are struggling to get the public's attention in a time of war. Only a third of the poll respondents could offer a name when asked who is running for the Democratic nomination in 2004 — about the same level as in January. Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry (news, bio, voting record) and Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman (news - web sites) were the best-known of the candidates, with about one in 10 people familiar with each of them, while others lagged behind. One in 10 Democrats, 9 percent, also named Al Gore (news - web sites), the 2000 Democratic nominee, who is not running this time.

The public's view of the Republican Party is slightly more favorable, 63 percent, than its view of the Democrats, 57 percent.

While Republicans almost unanimously support the war, Democrats are more divided, with 60 percent supporting and 31 percent opposing.

Bush Approval Rating Rises After War [snip]
story.news.yahoo.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (1716)4/19/2003 1:58:37 PM
From: Volsi Mimir  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Hey Whack......who is for Kerry anyway?

washingtonpost.com
Leads in Donation Unlisteds

Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) narrowly lost the presidential fundraising battle to Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) in the first three months of the year. But he was far ahead of his rivals in one dubious category: the percentage of donors who did not list their employer, occupation or both.

To help police campaign financing and make it easier for the public to see the sources of a candidate's funding, the Federal Election Commission requires committees to include the name of an employer and occupation for each contributor in the mandatory disclosure reports.

In the report Kerry filed Tuesday, about a third of his contributors either had "information requested" or a blank line under the "occupation" heading. The value of their contributions was about $2 million, out of a total of $7 million raised through March 31.

Kerry press secretary Robert Gibbs said the campaign was actively trying to obtain the information and was not attempting to disguise its contributors. Campaign staffers, he said, had first combed previous FEC records to see if their donors had contributed to other candidates, hoping to find occupations and employers that way. Failing that, the campaign has sent letters to contributors asking for the information.

"The campaign is doing everything it can and is required to do to get that information as soon as possible," said Chris Lehane, Kerry's communications director. "It did not require a call from the press. We did it on our own."

As additional information on donors' identities becomes available, Gibbs said, staffers will add it to a category created Friday on the Kerry campaign Web site, along with the original first-quarter report.

Edwards's campaign, which returned $10,000 in donations from employees at an Arkansas law firm after one of them said her boss had promised to reimburse her -- which is prohibited by law -- pointed to its success in identifying donors. "We are proud that we have identified 95 percent of our donors," said press secretary Jennifer Palmieri. "That is a record we are proud of."



To: American Spirit who wrote (1716)4/19/2003 2:08:08 PM
From: Volsi Mimir  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Hey Whack.....57 Flavors of the Ketchup King?

Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), who supported the Iraq resolution but sharply criticized Bush for his handling of the pre-war diplomacy, said he is withholding comment about the administration's challenge to the Syrians because he has not been briefed about Syria in several weeks, according to advisers. "I'd have to have further briefing before I make any judgment about what is directly linked to this initiative versus what is part of the ongoing problem with Syria," he said in a statement. "I think there is a distinction between the two."

While the rest are definite in their answers.......read:
washingtonpost.com