Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (17382)	4/16/2003 11:44:00 AM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 89467

Constitutional violations? What Constitutional violations? Bush had a Congressional resolution authorizing use of force and kept the Congress informed as required..... You appear to be stating your opinions laced with your bias as facts......

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (17382)	4/16/2003 12:58:46 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Being otherwise occupied yesterday, I had hundreds of posts to go through on this board alone. I was able to keep one eye on the market, and given that it was a short expiry week, thought we might get a pop today. Was monitoring my GTC short sale this morning. It was close to hitting, and I was getting nervous because the rally seemed to be running out of steam. Just as I clicked the "change order" button, I got a response that I couldn't change it because it had filled. Already nicely in the black. Great when a plan works. 'Course that's just the entry; no profits until the position is closed. Good luck on trying to change the opinions of a "True Believer". they could not even agree on "mosque vs state" issues This is a key point. I’ve been formulating a list of changes that are necessary to metamorphosize Middle Eastern states. Based on Ralph Peters' Seven Loser Factors carlisle-www.army.mil the first on my list is separation of church and state. lurqer

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (17382)	4/16/2003 7:28:55 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

I never claimed to be an expert at grammar. It has no bearing on my ability to think. It has no bearing on facts or reality. It has no bearing on my ability to reason or form a considered opinion. It makes neither you or me right or wrong. Its' <g> just a difference in showing possession. MS Word said no problemo. That was enough for me. You say wrong, my English Professor daddy taught me better. Cool! Can't ask for a more informed source. I already accepted your version as the correct one, OK? No need to ridicule & name call & label. Its' <g> not like my grammar is so below average that its' <g> absolutely riddled with grammatical errors. And trust me, I don't do much checking for grammar. I'm much more concerned with accurate, supportable content than grammar.