SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jrhana who wrote (9833)4/16/2003 11:58:50 AM
From: russwinter  Respond to of 39344
 
<some 2,3,4,5 baggers that the same is going to again happen.>

Briefly we got a great speculative market, and all us early birds made a killing. But that spec spike has kind of ruined this small cap junior market. It's still viable, but we need stocks that actually trade and have a liquid market, which is why you saw me switch emphasis to a little higher tier names such as MNG, WHT, IVN, WTZ, GBGLF, GBU, AGI and maybe RMX (kind of borderline). Clearly money can be made in off the radar great value stocks like BGI, and MOY, but managements need to do the right thing, sell out to companies who have currency (a real stock that actually trades). This constant lingering on is bullshit.



To: jrhana who wrote (9833)4/16/2003 12:04:34 PM
From: jrhana  Respond to of 39344
 
RGLD (?) short squeeze)

Does anyone have any information about RGLD?

the Yahoo board is of course less than useless

The best I can figure out either the Barron's article was full of it and/or there is a short squeeze going on here

I imagine a lot of small time shorts had the idea that RGLD would always be a good short because they got lucky once.

Meantime it is the star of my portfolios.



To: jrhana who wrote (9833)4/16/2003 12:19:01 PM
From: jimsioi  Respond to of 39344
 
jrhana, with regards the 'juniors'

You think you have liquidity problems, try trading these things in the pink sheets...LOL, though it's hardly funny.

We need the speculative froth or individual results to propel them higher. In time we'll get both in many cases but I am figuring it's going to take some time....