SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (5945)4/16/2003 5:05:11 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 7720
 
I read that column in the Post on Monday and was utterly unpersuaded. The basic point in the first couple of paragraphs was fine, but there was no brake on where he took it. Woolly headed, IMO.



To: TimF who wrote (5945)4/16/2003 8:11:33 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7720
 
Without being that extreme if you got rid of corporate welfare and most form of subsidies and reigned in redistributive spending, and as much of the pure pork as possible, you could keep government spending under control and reduce taxes while reducing or eliminating the deficit.

You left out the most important cut - the military.

Tom



To: TimF who wrote (5945)4/25/2003 2:33:10 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 7720
 
Yes, the utility of government does not indicate the appropriate level of government. If it is good to heat the house at 74 degrees, it does not mean it is better to heat it at 100.........


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News