SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (5493)4/16/2003 7:46:21 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 15987
 
Geezus!! I'm getting a bit p*ssed off at how top military leaders are stepping on their $%*@#! speaking out too quickly about possible weapons labs before they have some decent facts. I distinctly recall that an officer was quoted as stating that they were DEFINITELY DUAL USE, chemical and biological.

The very fact that these 11 containers were buried containing expensive scientific equipment seemed like some very real evidence of a WMD mobile lab.

The seach for the smoking gun continues (stay tuned).

edition.cnn.com

Tests rule out suspect bio-labs
Tuesday, April 15, 2003 Posted: 2153 GMT ( 5:53 AM HKT)

KARBALA, Iraq (CNN) -- The buried labs U.S. troops found last week were not the mobile chemical and biological weapons labs one U.S. Army general suspected, according to the head of an expert team brought in to examine them.

The 11 cargo containers were filled with new laboratory equipment apparently intended to make conventional weapons, said team leader Chief Warrant Officer 2 Monte Gonzalez.

"Based on what we've seen, the containers are full of millions of dollars worth of high-tech equipment," he said. "It possibly has a dual use. But it does not appear to be weapons of mass destruction."



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (5493)4/16/2003 8:15:51 PM
From: Rollcast...  Respond to of 15987
 
He just made himself look like an idiot, that's all.. Trying to "dis" Robert J. Samuelson as just some kind of know-nothing reporter..

The "professor" does this every day. Reporters are only credible when their work supports his political agenda.

And THIS is an ivy league professor...

At least JohnM claims he is...