SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (94087)4/16/2003 11:40:47 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
They are happy that NK is coming to the table, without one word about the fact that it was the Admin's stubbornness that forced them there. I remember them castigating the Admin for not dealing directly with the NK when this crisis broke. So two-faced!


Really. They do seem incorrigibly unable to understand that "diplomacy" is not a good in and of itself; it very much matters what terms the diplomacy is on.

And of course, they might have a little more credibility if they ever gave Bush a tiny bit of credit for anything. Just a little would do. But they seem to prefer undiluted partisanship to credibility.



To: LindyBill who wrote (94087)4/16/2003 11:44:18 PM
From: kumar  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
not wanting to enter into a debate on whether the administrations policy was the reason for N Korea to agree on multilateral talks - is it possible that they had 2nd thoughts after China cut off their oil supplies for a few days ?