SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: david who wrote (94120)4/17/2003 2:04:18 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I was not implying 'civilian policing' as an immediate action item. I was implying, that once a land has been occupied, and some order has been established, the Brits have experience in relinquishing control to the locals (same examples as in your post) gradually over a period of time.

The big difference IMHO, is the Brits dont typically try to acieve it in a year or a few months. Sometimes it takes decades, and they have the fortitude to go thru it.



To: david who wrote (94120)4/17/2003 11:08:55 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It is very dangerous in any nation to use the army for Civilian policing

I agree with you, david, bit it's a bit more complicated. The US has been doing precisely that for some time. Take a look at Dana Priest's, The Mission.