Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (393969)	4/17/2003 10:23:40 AM
From: JEB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

EU accepts coalition will run the show in Iraq From Rosemary Bennett in Athens EUROPEAN Union leaders yesterday reluctantly accepted a dominant role for the US and Britain in postwar Iraq as they sought to heal the wounds of recent months. Bowing to the inevitable, President Chirac, of France, said at an EU summit in Athens that United Nations involvement should be determined “issue by issue”. He previously insisted that only the UN could legitimately oversee political change in Iraq. Outside the summit the Greek capital saw its worst riots for 30 years as 7,000 anti-war protesters took to the streets and attempted to break police lines to reach the summit venue. After being turned back they pelted the British, French and Italian embassies with rocks, paint and petrol bombs. Inside, EU leaders did their best to paper over their bitter prewar rifts. Tony Blair and M Chirac held their first face-to-face meeting for nearly three months, chatting for 25 minutes in the grounds of the Athens’ EU summit venue at Zappeon Hall. An official described the meeting as “perfectly amiable”. M Chirac announced that the European Commission is to organise an urgent airlift to bring wounded Iraqi civilians — particularly children — to Europe for treatment. In further recognition that the situation in Iraq demanded immediate action, Denmark, Spain and the Netherlands announced plans to send troops to the country to help keep the peace, rather than wait for UN wheels to turn. “We can’t wait for a UN resolution,” Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Danish Prime Minister, said. After the EU had formally welcomed ten new members to its ranks in a ceremony near the Acropolis, Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, hailed a “new atmosphere”. But there was still some behind-the-scenes wrangling, with the British blocking a joint statement seeking once again precisely to define the UN’s role. “We will issue a statement when there is something to say,” one official said. After the talks, M Chirac’s spokeswoman indicated that the French President had softened his line. “There are many projects we can work on together and progressively to find a way to put the UN at the heart of the action. Issue by issue, we have to find the right balance between the role of the UN, which must be the essential role, and the American and British forces on the ground,” she said. The British, French, German and Spanish Foreign Ministers, whose countries all now have seats on the UN Security Council, discussed future resolutions authorising UN responsibilities in Iraq. They later met their counterparts from Russia and Bulgaria — also on the Security Council — to hammer out further details. Mr Straw said that it was too early to come up with the wording of future UN resolutions, but told fellow EU members that the UN’s role would be limited at the outset. “We are taking full account of our US partner in this. We have been saying to EU partners here that for the US, UK and Australia, who have put our young people’s lives in harm’s way, we have a profound responsibility to ensure their sacrifices have not been in vain.” timesonline.co.uk

To: TigerPaw who wrote (393969)	4/17/2003 11:26:20 AM
From: MARK BARGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Just a thought here... I have spoken with several liberals in my circle of friends recently who were/are diehard democrats and supported Gore in 2000. They disagree with much of Bush's domestic policy views. In view of recent historical events the last several years have become Bush supports and said they will fully support his reelection. On the other hand all of my republican friends still heartily support the Bush administration on 90% of what he is doing and wil work to reelect him. Bush's 70+% approval ratings are not a mystery, and not wholly due just to the war. Reelection looks to be a slam dunk. just a thought. MB