Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (69842)	4/17/2003 2:25:26 PM
From: chomolungma	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 70976

Actually you do. Not according to that Al Jazeera article I posted. you need to prove that the requirements for the sanctions have been met LOL! The intent of the sanctions was to get Saddam's regime to disarm. The fact that this regime no longer exists makes this kind of moot don't you think? (3) you need a motion to remove the sanctions and that motion should be put to a vote. Which could happen in a day if countries like Russia and France would act responsibly. It's funny, when I first started posting on this thread, all the talk was about the U.S. and oil. Now it appears that the ulterior motives were on the other side. The more I see of the U.N., the more I am convinced that it is a dysfunctional body that serves no purpose in the world. It is a body of fools.