SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (17501)4/17/2003 6:09:10 PM
From: NOW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
First it was SARS, now it is SAPS
workingforchange.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (17501)4/17/2003 9:17:53 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
My perspective is to cringe at the thought of PC thinking,
let alone 100% PC anything. Besides, PC thinking seems to
be something the previous administration pushed.

FWIW, I am at odds with this administration on a number of
issues relating to our safety & security, ET AL. That's a
fact. I'll admit that I can't think of anything militarily
that I have serious problems with thus far.

As much as you may disagree with that, nothing as yet has
changed my POV, not from you or anything anyone has posted,
nothing I have read or seen in the media or directly from
Bush, the Pentagon, Tommy Franks or Vincent Brooks, ET AL.
IOW, so far, so good.

My perspectives are formed through many means which I have
shared with you recently. My POV's are flexible. That is
because facts, events & reality unfold over time. I can &
will change my POV when facts, events & reality become at
odds with my POV.

I try to resist clinging to an inflexible POV. That often
leads to serious lapses of judgement because facts, events
& reality evolve with time, while inflexible POV's do not.

I'm sorry this has become such a divisive issue between us.
I still consider you a friend. I simply don't agree with
you on certain things, that's all. There is no reason to
make it personal IMO.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (17501)4/18/2003 8:56:49 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 89467
 
You were wrong...get over it....