Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (349)	4/17/2003 10:39:16 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

Ah, those allegations, claimed to be fact that are so lacking in credible evidence & receive so many adamant denials from credible sources using their names. And the authors (and their backgrounds), their allegations, 'er facts & credible info, their sources, both named & unnamed, etc., well.......... <font size=2>The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. New World Order Supplement, Iraqi Supplement<font size=3> Sorry Thomas. There's only so far I can stretch my imagination for conspiracy theories. There are more conspiracy theories than there are real world events. Did we support Iraq over Iran in their war? Perhaps we did. Was it all legal & proper. Perhaps. Perhaps not. Did we help Saddam into power? Nothing I've seen on the subject has yet to sway me. If anything, it has done the opposite. Too many conspiracy theories are like a bad Hollywood B movie that went straight to video. I had to suspend too much disbelief. I don't buy into the plethora of Clinton conspiracy theories either FWIW. Besides, how do alleged mistakes from the past make doing the right thing now somehow wrong or improper?