SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sciAticA errAticA who wrote (31824)4/18/2003 10:09:31 AM
From: sciAticA errAticA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Washington sidesteps UN in search for WMDs


Odai Sirri



The Bush Administration is in a conundrum. The United States has called for an end to economic sanctions that have plagued Iraq for almost 13 years. To end the sanctions however, the UN Security Council must approve such a resolution. Russia though has said that it wants UN inspectors to confirm Iraq was clear of weapons of mass destruction before it will vote to remove sanctions.



Almost one month has passed since the start of the war on Iraq, and the United States has yet to find a 'smoking gun'. ‘Don’t worry,’ is the message from Washington. The eerie sense of calm from the US State Department though may be justified if taking into account recent remarks from former CIA analysts.



“Some of my colleagues are virtually certain that there will be some weapons of mass destruction found, even though they might have to be planted,” said retired CIA intelligence analyst Ray McGovern. He told the AFP that he believes that some amount of banned weapon will be found but not, “by any stretch [that] would justify the charge of a threat against the US or anyone else.”



US Secretary of State Colin Powell has a different viewpoint. On Thursday, Powell told PBS that he was “reasonably sure” that proof would be discovered. “We are quite confident of our intelligence,” he said.



With each passing day analysts have begun to openly question if the war on Iraq will be the first time a war has ended without full vindication of the cause.



Earlier in the day, chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said his inspectors could be back in Iraq in as little as two weeks, provided the Security Council gives approval for a resumption of inspections.



Most of the 15-member Security Council would like to see UN inspectors return to Iraq and complete their work-which was abruptly interrupted by the US desire to go to war. In an interview today with the BBC, Blix said the UN inspectors are ready to return to Iraq as soon as the Security Council gives the go-ahead.



Blix, who is due to appear in front of the Security Council on 22 April suggested that Iraq may have been telling the truth about its alleged weapons of mass destruction programme. Blix said that he is “perhaps more inclined to believe” Baghdad now, rather than before the US launched its attack.



“We have never claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, although we could not rule it out. Now we will see if London and Washington were right,” he said.



Thanks, but we’ll go it alone


But in a move that may frustrate the international community, the US has signalled that they would rather see its own hand-picked inspectors in Iraq.



A US defence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters that there are already some US inspectors in Iraq examining suspect sites around the country. There are “approximately 10 former UN inspectors and personnel applying their experience and expertise to the French President Jacques Chirac (L) and United Nations Secretary General Ghanaian Kofi Annan answer journalists' questions 17 April 2003
effort,” the official stated.



The official admitted though that the inspectors are Americans. He later added that over two dozen sites had been visited since the start of the war, and that “the pace of such visits is expanding.”



The controversial move may prove to be problematic due to the lack of credibility that the United States has in the Arab world. The US was earlier accused of using the UN inspectors as spies on Iraq under former chief inspector Richard Butler’s tenure from 1998 to 1999.



Irrespective of what happens in coming weeks in terms of inspections, the US finds itself in a race against the clock. As each day passes without any evidence of chemical or biological weapons, public irritation increases. Much of the international community also prefers to see the United Nations play a larger role in rebuilding Iraq, economically and socially.



To begin the rebuilding process however, sanctions must be removed. Ironically, to remove the US-led sanctions the US will need the support of the UN, the same UN that the US seems to be jockeying out of the picture. --Al Jazeera with agencies



April 18, 2003

english.aljazeera.net

==========

Under pressure, US sending team to ferret out WMD

Under intense pressure to prove the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the United States is sending a 1,000-strong force to Iraq to hunt them out.



US defence officials said the "Iraq Survey Group" would probably be led by a general and would consist of military personnel, government intelligence analysts, civilian scientists and private contractors.



Initial elements of the WMD team are already on the ground in Iraq and the full contingent should be operational within two weeks, the officials said.

The survey team will focus on putting a larger number of personnel into Iraq to conduct a more organized search for WMD based on intelligence leads. This latest effort to locate the elusive WMD is part of the increasing perception in the Pentagon that the US no longer expects to find them on its own, but will have to offer rewards to Iraqis to draw out information on where to look.



Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had earlier said, "I think what will happen is, we'll discover people who will tell us where to go find it."



"It is not like a treasure hunt, where you just run around looking everywhere hoping you find something," said Rumsfeld. "The (UN weapons) inspectors didn't find anything, and I doubt that we will. What we will do is find the people who will tell us."



Pressure is mounting on US forces in Iraq to uncover any banned weapons, which it cited as its main justification for invading the country and toppling Saddam Hussein. The US and Britain had repeatedly accused Saddam Hussein of threatening world peace by amassing weapons of mass destruction, yet no such weapons have yet been discovered.



UN diplomats are now insisting that sanctions should not be lifted until the Security Council certifies that Iraq is free of WMD.



"If the weapons are not identified and found then I think people will start to ask very, very serious questions about what the war was really all about," Richard Butler, former head of UN weapons inspections in Iraq said.



Hans Blix, Butler's successor who pulled his team out of Iraq before the US-led invasion, said his inspectors could be back in Iraq within two weeks. The US has said it prefers to do the job itself.



"So far they have not found any weapons of mass destruction," Blix said. "I think at some stage they would like to have some credible international verification of what they find."



The capture in Baghdad of Saddam Hussein’s half-brother Barzan Ibrahim Hasan al-Tikriti, has meanwhile raised some US hopes that he might help to locate any possible WMDs.



Al Jazeera with agency inputs



April 18, 2003


english.aljazeera.net



To: sciAticA errAticA who wrote (31824)4/18/2003 10:57:15 AM
From: portage  Respond to of 74559
 
It's one thing for the tanks and bombs to be brought to bear against Saddam's armies.

But if the citizenry unites in some form of mass opposition to US occupation (we've never seen that kind of action from the Arab street, have we ? -g), what will the US forces do ? If they start shooting or pushing around civilians, I doubt that will be too well received. Then it becomes evident that they're there for conquest and hegemony, not "liberation". Could get intense and dicey. TWT