Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (14448)	4/18/2003 5:14:06 PM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 21614

The U.S. was not bringing chemicals and yet they too had new anti-chemical/bio suits. Rumsfeld said that he planned to spray the Iraqi's with tear gas in violation of the Geneva convention.

To: rrufff who wrote (14448)	4/18/2003 6:06:36 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Who does not have anti-chemical/bio suits?? As well as a little drugstore shelf of antidotes.. Just try to come up with the name of one nation?? I'm fairly sure even the couple of square-foot Monaco has some in case somebody would lose too much on the casinos and go chemical, Ames or similar. if not, something would be badly wrong. But being plain and fully stupid is not against the human rights, although attempts have been made to correct that, at least for voting rights.