Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Heinz Blasnik- Views You Can Use -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (289)	4/20/2003 9:58:05 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4905

isn't that amazing. actually, the implications are huge for any previous designs to create closed systems.. e.g. a british commonwealth... which is essentially what NAFTA was shaping into.... job distribution/goods creation outside of the "zone" pretty much nips that in the bud. maybe someone else knows if tech is going across the border, but i'd have to assume those same jobs can be replicated in china and india or else where in asia etc. bottom line.. for every job around the world, there is an infinite line of people living in china and india prepared to step into it. if somehow countries feel they can reverse this trend by closing their systems and raising barriers, i suppose you may have companies making no money, but survivor countries will be those most able to be self sufficient... usa could probably do that.. it has most everything except energy (in its present form). but you would then have a rationed government directed internal system of trade. got King George?