SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (22911)4/21/2003 11:08:10 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 27666
 
URL:http://jewishworldreview.com/toons/gorrel/gorrell1.asp



To: calgal who wrote (22911)4/21/2003 11:10:38 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 27666
 
URL:http://www.jewishworldreview.com/toons/kelley/skelley1.asp



To: calgal who wrote (22911)4/21/2003 11:11:13 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 27666
 
URL:http://jewishworldreview.com/toons/crowe/crowe1.asp



To: calgal who wrote (22911)4/21/2003 11:11:31 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27666
 
Cross Fire
President Bush is a Christian. Why does that bother people?

BY ROBERT L. BARTLEY
Monday, April 21, 2003 12:01 a.m. EDT

URL:http://opinionjournal.com/columnists/rbartley/?id=110003379

Easter Monday is an apt time to note that President George W. Bush has been taking darts as a born-again Christian. This tells us something about today's president, and something more about today's religion.

The president comes by his faith, of course, because he stopped drinking and found God at age 40. As a Methodist, he's not exactly a speaking-in-tongues Pentecostal, but he clearly does believe that good and evil walk the world. He also says things such as, "Behind all of life and all of history, there's a dedication and a purpose, set by the hand of a just and faithful God." This comes from the Presidential Prayer Breakfast, where other presidents have said similar things. But both friend and foe have the sense that Mr. Bush really means it.

The surprising thing is how much of the carping about the president's religion, especially in the context of war against Saddam Hussein, comes from the ranks of those who represent religion. Thus prominent theologian Martin Marty pens a piece in Newsweek entitled "The Sin of Pride," complaining about the President's "evident conviction that he's doing God's will."

The Christian Century, similarly, devoted most of its March 8 issue to a barrage of war criticism. "Imperialism, American Style," was the title of the salvo by eminent sociologist Robert Bellah. "Americans may not have thought of the World Trade Center or the Pentagon as the symbolic headquarters of a world empire," he explained, "but the men with the box cutters certainly did, and so do numberless millions who cheered their terrifying exercise."

The Christian Century editors complained that Mr. Bush's actions, such as a hands-off attitude toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, give "tacit support" to the wrong religious perspective. They are "in line with end-times scenarios imagined by some conservative Christians and fictionalized in the 'Left Behind' series that has sold over 50 million volumes since 1995. Up to 40 percent of Americans believe that we are living in the last days, says historian Paul S. Boyer, and that history is racing toward an apocalyptic clash between the forces of good and evil. Millions of Americans believe that the Bible foretells regime change in Iraq, that God established Israel's boundaries millennia ago, and the United Nations is a forerunning of a satanic world order."

Holy Cow, Mr. Bush is caught in the cross fire of a religious civil war. These are the voices of liberal Protestantism, which once again finds itself out of step with the pews. The pope has the same problem, of course, in declaring the war "a crime against humanity." In March the Pew Research Center found that 62% of both Catholics and mainline Protestants backed the war, compared with 44% of non-believers and 77% of evangelicals.
In contrast to The Christian Century, commentary in Christianity Today, launched by Billy Graham, ran toward a sermon by Philip Jensen, dean of Saint Andrew's Anglican Cathedral in Sydney, Australia. To wit, "Apocalypse Again and Again: The Bible doesn't tell us when to go to war but how to live in a war-ridden world." And Marvin Olasky's World Magazine ran a headline "Onward Christian Soldiers," over a movie review noting that troops headed to Iraq previewed the Civil War epic "Gods and Generals."

Ardent religions are growing, while liberal ones are declining. The leading study, "Religious Congregations and Membership: 2000" by the Glenmary Research Center, found that the Mormon church grew 19.3% in the 1990s. Also gaining were evangelical churches; the Christian Churches and Churches of Christ up 18.6%, and the Assemblies of God, up 18.5%. The Roman Catholic Church, no doubt helped by burgeoning Hispanics, grew 16.2%. Meanwhile, the Presbyterian Church USA shrank 11.6%. Trailing the list was the United Church of Christ, which has rewritten its hymnal to eliminate masculine pronouns and other politically incorrect language. Over the decade it lost 14.8% of its membership.

On net, religious impulses are probably growing. September 11 persuaded others besides George Bush that evil is an active force in the world. The science of the Big Bang and DNA looks much more like the work of a creator than the cold world of Newtonian Laws and Darwinian evolution. And at least indirectly the horrors of the 20th century showed that the latter provides no moral compass.

The Scopes Monkey trial of 1925, the great defeat of the fundamentalists, has in particular come in for reassessment. Noting for example that the ACLU advertised for a plaintiff, a 2002 PBS documentary let the people of Dayton, Tenn. say that they were not the dolts depicted by the news dispatches of H. L. Mencken and the 1960 movie "Inherit the Wind." And in his new Mencken biography "The Skeptic," Terry Teachout points to the unlovely side of the philosophy animating his account: A disdain of democracy, for example, in favor of credo of Social Darwinism, applying survival of the fittest to human communities, and its corollary of eugenics, shortly later discredited by the Third Reich.

As for the Iraq war, what do the pope and liberal theologians make of the cheering crowds in Baghdad and Saddam's torture chambers? The president's success has confounded his critics. His decision, whatever role Divine Guidance played, clearly was what psychologists call inner-directed. His war cabinet meetings did not include people such as Karl Rove, Karen Hughes or Ari Fleischer. Somehow it's better, I suspect, for a president to talk to God than to talk to pollsters.

Mr. Bartley is editor emeritus of The Wall Street Journal. His column appears Mondays in the Journal and on OpinionJournal.com.



To: calgal who wrote (22911)4/25/2003 5:06:38 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 27666
 
April 25, 2003
Ashcroft: U.S. can hold illegals
By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Attorney General John Ashcroft says the government can detain illegal immigrants indefinitely when federal authorities determine they pose a threat to national security.

In a 19-page opinion requested by the Department of Homeland Security in a case involving a Haitian immigrant, Mr. Ashcroft said "such national security considerations clearly constitute a reasonable foundation for the exercise of my discretion to deny release on bond."
Signed last week, the opinion has not been made public but has been reviewed by several immigration judges and attorneys, who said yesterday that it appears to reaffirm that the Justice Department, not the Department of Homeland Security, retains primary authority over immigration law.
The opinion, according to those who have reviewed it, gives the attorney general "broad discretion" in determining the status of detained illegal immigrants in the country. It also overturns a recent ruling by an immigration appeals board in Florida in a case involving Haitian asylum seeker David Joseph, who sought release on bond while an immigration judge decided his case.
Several federal agencies had opposed Mr. Joseph's release on bond, fearing that national security would be threatened if his release from custody sparked an influx of Haitians looking to immigrate to the United States, taxing the overburdened Coast Guard, Border Patrol and other law enforcement resources aimed at guarding against terrorist attacks.
Mr. Joseph, 18, was among 216 undocumented Haitians and others aboard a 50-foot boat from Haiti that reached Biscayne Bay in Miami in October. Dozens of the passengers jumped from the boat, scurrying to a nearby causeway, where they tried to cram into passing vehicles. Others were picked up in the water by the Coast Guard.
The Bush administration changed its detention policy on Haitian refugees in December to discourage a feared exodus from the Caribbean nation.
According to the State Department, Haiti has become "a staging point" for non-Haitians, including Pakistanis and Palestinians, considered security risks looking to enter the United States. The Ashcroft ruling appears to apply to all illegal immigrants except Cubans, who are permitted by law to remain in the United States if they reach its shores, the sources said.
In his ruling, Mr. Ashcroft said the release of illegal immigrants in custody without performing adequate background checks would undercut U.S. immigration policy.
"Surges in such illegal migration by sea injure national security by diverting valuable Coast Guard and [Defense Department] resources from counterterrorism and homeland security responsibilities," Mr. Ashcroft said, noting the State Department report of "an increase in third-country nations using Haiti as a staging point for attempted migration to the United States."
The Department of Homeland Security had asked for the ruling in the Joseph case, seeking to block his release on an ordered $2,500 bond. An immigration judge in Miami ruled that the government did not have the legal authority to hold Mr. Joseph based on national security concerns.
Despite the bond order, Mr. Joseph remained in custody pending an appeal by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, which argued that his release would threaten important national security interests. His asylum request was denied, a decision he appealed.
Within weeks of the September 11 attacks, Mr. Ashcroft ordered a new terrorism task force to crack down on illegal immigration. He said at the time that the United States "will not allow terrorists to use our hospitality as a weapon against us."
The attorney general has since given the FBI, the U.S. Marshals Service and local law enforcement agencies the power to arrest persons on suspicions of violating immigration law.
The INS was split into separate agencies March 1 and transferred to the Department of Homeland Security. The Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services handles residency and asylum matters. Law enforcement responsibilities are handled by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection.

URL:http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20030425-98656436.htm