SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (95307)4/21/2003 1:10:39 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Consensus, compromise, respect for Others. Renouncing Force as a problem-solver. The opposite of what we're currently doing.

I would be interested in your explanation of how the proper model could have been applied to Saddam Hussein.



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (95307)4/21/2003 3:52:50 AM
From: Dennis O'Bell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The only model that allows for survival, let alone prosperity or freedom, is the EU model, not the Napoleanic model.

Behind this "EU Model", are the same old bs economic special interests and convenient support of thugs calling themselves leaders of nations who have this or that natural resource that needs exploitation.

While I agree that this unilateral action theorized and put in practice by Rumsfeld is simply not workable long term, nobody on this low world of ours has any moral standing to give out lessons to others, certainly not this "Old Europe".

Even in the civilized, safe West, order is kept by police, and an absence of police for a length of time would lead to chaos. But worldwide, there is effectively a lack of any such law enforcement ready to act in a timely manner, so most of the world is like these housing projects the local authorities rarely dare venture into, and only when absolutely necessary, and where gang leaders rule things.

I have no idea what would ever motivate the world at large to reach the kind of consensus to allow creation of such a global order keeping police, one that would react swiftly and decisively to the beginnings of genocides for example, and with the necessary checks and balances, but I think this is something that will be necessary given human nature.



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (95307)4/21/2003 10:44:35 AM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 281500
 
Renouncing Force as a problem-solver. The opposite of what we're currently doing.

Who is "we" in your sentence?

If the US, then it's an incomplete description of things.



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (95307)4/21/2003 4:35:46 PM
From: Brian Sullivan  Respond to of 281500
 
Renouncing Force as a problem-solver. The opposite of what we're currently doing.

I think that we are:

Renouncing France as a problem-solver.