Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shack who wrote (71722)	4/21/2003 10:04:28 AM
From: illyia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

So the correct answer is everything is wrong with that count - technically. And, yet, you must see what I mean... Eh? i. edit: I suppose what I am asking is, "Why does it work?" Because it appears to - as a form. The ABC down is three distinct waves, albeit the C is very much foreshortened in either case. The wedge is the same in both - and, if you recall - the earlier wedge counted out five at the end (the abcde of my label). I have seen no other count so simple that fits.... perhaps I change the 1-5 up to abcde... and I grant that proper procedure separates the hacks (me) from the experienced... but all the same, e, then down...?