Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (5441)	4/21/2003 1:18:54 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13056

Actually, I find being against urestricted abortion (a phrase that lacks the overtones of either anti-choice or pro-life) hard for a libertarian to justify. And I think the death penalty is very much in line with libertarian principles IF you are assuming the existence of a pure libertarian government. Choice is, IMO, the key to libertarianism WHERE IT DOES NOT IMPACT THE RIGHTS OF ANOTHER PERSON. But if you kill somebody else, you have made a choice to impact their right to life. IMO, that constitues making a choice to accept death by the state. Essential to libertarianism, IMO, is the belief that choices have consequences; that the right to make choices entails the obligation to accept their consequences. As long as the rules are reasonably clear and reasonably evenhandedly enforced, I think even a libertarian society is entitled, if not obligated, to say that making certain choices delibertely to deprive someone else of life without justification, or deliberately to expose your neighbors to serious harm from an enemy, constitutes making a choice to have the society end your own right to life. There is nothing un-libertarian about this, IMO.