SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tsigprofit who wrote (533)4/22/2003 3:27:26 PM
From: Coz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
It is looking increasingly odd that they have found
zero WMD. We were told that this was the primary reason
that the US was going in. That we would not allow a
country like Iraq to have these weapons, and threaten us.


This is not to say that they won't find these WMD, but considering before the war, the administration was talking about these things in terms of thousands of tons, even if they moved ALL the WMD to Syria or some other yet-to-be-named "evil country" you would think they would at least find some residue somewhere. Some trace amount of evidence to at least confirm the possibility that something had indeed existed in Iraq.

I mean, they send people to death row based on the amount of saliva left behind in a licked stamp. If they can find that, there ought to be something left behind after moving a thousand tons of anthrax into some secret place.

--Coz