Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JakeStraw who wrote (396388)	4/22/2003 12:40:29 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Kosovo at least had support of NATO. Kosovo had clear support of Congress specific to that action. Kosovo was mainly a humanitarian effort to stop the ongoing genocide. UN did eventually support the efforts in Kosovo. And the UN had/has a role in peacekeeping there. There was no fuzzy logic in starting that one. It was all clear and upfront what the motives for the war were and what the objectives were. There were no phantom WMDs, terrorists, no oil for the taking, no hidden agenda like this one has. No comparision IMO between Iraq and Kosovo IMO.