Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (236977)	4/22/2003 3:08:35 PM
From: Lucretius	Respond to of 436258

lmao

To: MythMan who wrote (236977)	4/22/2003 3:08:47 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

nope -- none -- nada -- zilch nice post by 'trotsky to Ted Butler' >>Date: Tue Apr 22 2003 14:51 trotsky (ted butler) ID#377387: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved 'when is unknowable'...that may well be, but it's also important. consider that you have been singing the same song for x amount of years now - simply leaving money in a money market fund during that time would have produced a sizeable return compared to silver ( i seem to remeber bullish silver articles of yours dating back to at least '97 ) . the same money put in T - bonds would have left silver's return in the dust. that said, you may well be finally right about it, and i agree the risk is probably small, and has been small for quite some time. but i still wonder why you wouldn't want to wait for e.g. a technical break-out? who cares if it's 'violent'...after all, if you're right with your price expectations, what does it matter if one ends up paying $4.50 or alternatively $5 or $5.50 per oz.? it's not as if we're going to wake up to $50 silver overnight... <<