Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackhach who wrote (168295)	4/22/2003 7:17:28 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572374

No anthrax culprit It isn't Bush's job to personally resolve every crime commited in the US. No Osama, No Saddam The individuals are less important then destroying as much of their power as possible. If we got Osama and Saddam but the Baath party still ruled Iraq and Al Qaeda was almost untouched we would be worse off then we are now. No WMD It hasn't been to long and Iraq is a big place. No new foreign alliances I'm not exactly sure what you are getting at here. Why would you expect each president to creare new foreign alliances? NO new JOBS Only being stagnant instead of being in a deep recession, after a bubble like the one we came out of isn't so bad. If the economy is no better when Bush comes up for relection then you might have a point, at least inter terms of politics. The impact of the president on the economy is often overstated, but the president pays the price if the economy stays bad long enough. Tim