SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (95734)4/25/2003 10:49:47 PM
From: Dayuhan  Respond to of 281500
 

The timeline on this is all bets are off if a "heatbloom" appears at the reprocessing plant.

I still have this sneaking worry that they are doing it somewhere else. They've had the time, and they certainly have the incentive.



To: LindyBill who wrote (95734)4/29/2003 11:00:15 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Respond to of 281500
 
<all bets are off if a "heatbloom" appears at the reprocessing plant. >

Isn't it a fairly simple engineering problem, to disperse and hide waste heat? Instead of having it come out of one exhaust pipe, spread it out over 100, or 1000. Pump it underground, into reserviors, or miles away.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News