SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (1802)4/23/2003 8:58:07 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10965
 
I am in agreement with you. Santorum knew exactly what he was saying, though I suspect that he did not anticipate that his remarks would get such a reaction. On the other hand, maybe he did. I did some checking and he won re-election in 2000 by 335,000 votes, a 52% to 45% margin over Ron Kirk. Bush lost the state by 202,000 votes.

You probably recall that Santorum offered himself as the alternative to Frist.



To: John Carragher who wrote (1802)4/23/2003 9:42:34 AM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
He is exactly the man I would vote for. He does not feel the need to suck up the the homo community, he understands that it will be those very kinds of people that will be the downfall of America. It is beyond me to think that everyone can bash President Bush for being a Christian, and no one worries about it, and yet bitch when anyone does not kowtow to the abortion lovers and homos.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News