Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (15541)	4/23/2003 6:53:36 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

re: If you take some 50-60, or a really large number of different stochastic variables of anything, add them together, what do you get?? you can not really add stochastic variables since they represent different dimensions. Even in a Markov system those 50-60 stochastic variables represent a 50-60 dimensional space that is usually close to impossible to process. In a non-markov system it gets worse, the non-markov one-variable system (non-markov 1-factor Ito's process) that I am working with right now is equivalent to 72 dimensional Markov system. I am glad though that you can spell word stochastic <gggggggggg> re: it proves something, especially after those variables have been hand picked and tweaked for decades. are you still talking about that super complex stochastic system or a sample (observations) re: What about those who claim that if it turns out be a gaussian distribution do you still want to question the validity of claims with extensive knowledge of the statistical systems / models <gggggg> PS you have to teach me statistics how it is tought in your country, france - should be a lot of fun