Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (15564)	4/23/2003 12:51:30 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

1) Agree with point 1 but still feel that US had to act. Better for Iraq, humanity and US that Saddam gone even if more problems are created to be dealt w/. 2) Rest of world is scrambling a bit now and I think will come around the next time a tyrant or injustice is big enough. 3) The cash belongs to Iraq and US has declared that. I'm saying US hasn't said IRAQ can't or won't pay. It suggested that France and Russia forgive. If France were able to trap personal funds in France that belonged to Uday, Quesay or Baghdad Bob, then I wouldn't be opposed to giving that to them. Actually, I like Baghdad Bob and would like to see him in comedy. He'd be a great stand-up.