Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gus who wrote (397656)	4/23/2003 5:00:26 PM
From: Mark Konrad	Respond to of 769667

A perfect post, Gus. Wish I could stick around to watch the squirming and weasling. Have a great day--MK--

To: Gus who wrote (397656)	4/23/2003 5:14:32 PM
From: Jerrel Peters	Respond to of 769667

Makes some sense. I look forward to the squirming and weaseling that another posted mentioned.

To: Gus who wrote (397656)	4/23/2003 5:14:36 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 769667

Thanks Gus! A very worthy contribution to the debate.

To: Gus who wrote (397656)	4/23/2003 7:11:49 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Kerry doesn't blame American first, he blames Bush for failing us on almost every single meaningful issue a president is responsible for handling. Bush's lack of new ideas and solutions is appalling. In fact, most of his policies actually make the problems worse. Kerry's war record is important because is starkly differentiates him from the cliched notion of a "Massachusetts liberal" like Dukakis. It also proves his courage, manliness (important because the right always attempts to emasculate Dem candidates, impossible with JK) and sincerity when he speaks about America's defense, veterans and government service. JK is tough as they come on counter-terrorism, backed the Iraq War but pushed for broader diplomacy, did not kowtow to the anti-war groups, will stand tough on all our real security needs but will at the same time keep our friends close and cooperative around the world. Bush's crew has alienated so many allies of ours it will take a new administration to heal the rifts. And those are costly rifts. My guess is the only reason they alienated so many was because they wanted Iraqi oil for themselves. What other explanation? If Bush had waited a few weeks, he could have gotten a dozen or two more countries to join us in Iraq. But he was determined to go it alone. And this I see as a breach of duty and compromise of US interests. After all, what is trust and popularity worth to the US around the world? A lot more than a few extra oil-fields.