To: i-node who wrote (565 ) 4/24/2003 10:50:28 AM From: pcstel Read Replies (2) | Respond to Only a few months ago you were talking about how SACS/CPGA would NEVER come down -- you'd NEVER seen a subscriber model where these expenses came down. "how SACS/CPGA would NEVER come down -- you'd NEVER seen a subscriber model where these expenses came down. " "No, you're correct here -- I misspoke. The correct statement would have been that subscriptions being acquired TODAY will be paid for one year from today. " was completely incorrect, and now attempt to change the subject into another completely false statement like No, you're correct here -- I misspoke. The correct statement would have been that subscriptions being acquired TODAY will be paid for one year from today. Your experience notwithstanding, it really depends on what the total costs are and the number of "gross adds" (I got that from high-school math). When you are experiencing exponential subscriber growth, the CPGA will decline correspondingly. I don't doubt your understanding of some subscriber models; it is clear, however, that you haven't analyzed this one correctly.
